|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A SAGE mistake / sng\'s
it's been years since my days in stt, but isn't icm just assigning chip values based on your opponents range, and seeing how much real $ that makes various actions worth? i can understand how the payout structures would make one facet of that a non-factor, but i don't get how it's not applicable at all. what am i misunderstanding?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A SAGE mistake / sng\'s
On SNG Wizard:
I don't see how it applies to HUSNGs. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A SAGE mistake / sng\'s
Does sngwiz/sngpt automatically assume 50/30/20 payout? If not couldn't you set a 100/0 payout, put one opponent, and have a much better tool than SAGE?
If not, how hard would it be for someone familiar w/ icm to make a program that adjusts to the 100/0 payout of a headsup sng? I feel like I must be missing something, cuz why didn't someone else notice, but can't think of what it is. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: A SAGE mistake / sng\'s
There's no ICM in heads up situations. Every single chip has the exact same value.
|
|
|