|
|
#81
11-13-2007, 01:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
So you ran bad on AIE and flopping sets. Also let me add that the games are a tad bit tougher than they were at the beginning of the year. So if you're not winning 3+ptBB/100 then so be it. [/ QUOTE ] The games aren't much tougher. And they'll forever be around this level of easy in my opinion. I don't think there's any good excuse not to be able to win ~4ptbb long term up through 5/10 NL. 
|
|
#82
11-13-2007, 01:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
too eazy,
You kill me. We need yo get you signed to a 10 post a day contract or something. [ QUOTE ] In my experience, I don't think 5+ ptbb can be achieved long term without at least 17vpip in full ring at 1/2+... [/ QUOTE ] Do you mean at least (18vpip==good) or at most (18vpip==bad)? [ QUOTE ] And is that the standard PTBB? [/ QUOTE ] A little arithmetic would show the latter, BB/100. Anyway. His vpip is ~10 UTG & UTG+1. So he's playing pairs and AK roughly. Is it your suspicion that he's over committing to his big pairs? Raising too many small pairs that are difficult to play post flop? Some combination of both?
|
|
#83
11-13-2007, 01:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
Wow @ BareAce11. I didnt think it was possible to have that kind of winrate w/ those types of stats. can someone post their screen shot of the top 20 winners in the pokerstars nl200 game?
|
|
#84
11-13-2007, 01:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
God knows how BareAce11 has those results. Is he/she on here? I clashed him him/her a lot today and he (sod it, I'm going with a he) didn't impress me much. For a start he lost a meaningless pot vs me when I let him bluff off and then spent the next two hours 'playing' me non-stop to try and get even. Making it person isn't the trait of a solid player IMHO.
|
|
#87
11-13-2007, 03:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
Just for jollies Smart Money, you should post the picture of the list of players at the other end of the $ Won column. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
|
#89
11-13-2007, 03:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
Grunching
I'm guessing you're 2-barrelling and 3-barelling little pairs raised in EP whilst trying to represent big pairs, and not getting away with it. You play the same people over and over? They may have you pegged on this. Also, are you pushing QQ preflop into tags? Where is QQ in your earner list?
|
|
#90
11-13-2007, 03:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: anyone who is reasonable at poker, please read and comment
[ QUOTE ]
too eazy, You kill me. We need yo get you signed to a 10 post a day contract or something. [/ QUOTE ] Explain further, I don't understand. (English = Second Language). [ QUOTE ] Do you mean at least (18vpip==good) or at most (18vpip==bad)? [/ QUOTE ] I mean 17+ VPIP = Good. And I don't care to elaborate on why I think OP's UTG and UTG+1 spots are his problem.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
