|
|
#12
08-14-2007, 02:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
I don't think I've ever seen anyone 5-bet a river without the nuts in the 20-40 @ Bay101. 67s is certainly possible for a good player here, I might play a hand just like this if I was in a mood or something, he would probably raise this in the HJ and might cap preflop for deceptive purposes. I just call the 5 bet.
|
|
#14
08-14-2007, 02:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
[ QUOTE ]
6bet. he probably assumes you cannot have aces here given your preflop line. i'd even be tempted to 8bet. [/ QUOTE ] you guys are all ridiculous spewers. i have played with said villain a good amount, and he strikes me as a guy who WOULD 4-bet a supposedly good player with 76s and also a guy who can read hands well enough to not go completely apesh*t here with TT.
|
|
#15
08-14-2007, 02:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 6bet. he probably assumes you cannot have aces here given your preflop line. i'd even be tempted to 8bet. [/ QUOTE ] you guys are all ridiculous spewers. i have played with said villain a good amount, and he strikes me as a guy who WOULD 4-bet a supposedly good player with 76s and also a guy who can read hands well enough to not go completely apesh*t here with TT. [/ QUOTE ] 8betting may be a bit much, but are you really not 6betting?????
|
|
#17
08-14-2007, 08:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] 6bet. he probably assumes you cannot have aces here given your preflop line. i'd even be tempted to 8bet. [/ QUOTE ] you guys are all ridiculous spewers. i have played with said villain a good amount, and he strikes me as a guy who WOULD 4-bet a supposedly good player with 76s and also a guy who can read hands well enough to not go completely apesh*t here with TT. [/ QUOTE ] 8betting may be a bit much, but are you really not 6betting????? [/ QUOTE ] i really am not 6betting. who really 5-bets this river with TT anyways?
|
|
#18
08-14-2007, 09:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think I've ever seen anyone 5-bet a river without the nuts in the 20-40 @ Bay101. 67s is certainly possible for a good player here, I might play a hand just like this if I was in a mood or something, he would probably raise this in the HJ and might cap preflop for deceptive purposes. I just call the 5 bet. [/ QUOTE ] This sums it up well. Almost no one in that game is going to five bets with a smaller set the way the hand was played and with the A on the board.
|
|
#20
08-14-2007, 09:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 20/40 at Bay 101 against a TAG
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] who really 5-bets this river with TT anyways? [/ QUOTE ] a guy who KNOWS that hero cannot have the nuts or 2nd nuts given the preflop line hero took. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, but does the villain "KNOW" the hero would lay down AA in this spot, which is a very likely hand that he has considering the action?
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
