|
|
#1
11-09-2007, 02:36 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Backdoor Two Pair, unclear on river decision FTP$100nl
I got there on the river but I'm really not sure what the correct river action is. Comments on all streets are very welcome as I feel like this hand might have been butchered.
Reads: Villain is 35vpip/14pfr/8.5total aggression/100 hands I am running 28/20 with a 3.2 aggression factor. Full Tilt Poker, $0.50/$1 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 5 Players LeggoPoker Hand History Converter CO: $106.75 Hero (BTN): $136.40 SB: $111.95 BB: $110.50 UTG: $150.65 Pre-Flop: T  7 dealt to Hero (BTN)<font color="red">UTG raises to $3.50</font>, CO folds, Hero calls $3.50, 2 folds Flop: ($8.50) 2 J A (2 Players)UTG checks, Hero checks Turn: ($8.50) 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">UTG bets $8.50</font>, Hero calls $8.50 River: ($25.50) T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">UTG bets $19</font> What should the hero do? 
|
|
#3
11-09-2007, 03:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Backdoor Two Pair, unclear on river decision FTP$100nl
[ QUOTE ]
Min-raise/fold imo. [/ QUOTE ] Looks good. Not sure about the flop, a bet is certainly reasonable, read-dependent there.
|
|
#5
11-09-2007, 03:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Backdoor Two Pair, unclear on river decision FTP$100nl
[ QUOTE ]
PF is poor. [/ QUOTE ] Eh, they're just deep enough and Villain is just loose enough for this to be OK I think, even for a nit like me. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
|
|
#6
11-09-2007, 03:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Backdoor Two Pair, unclear on river decision FTP$100nl
I can understand how pf can be iffy. When he checked the flop warning bells of a check-raise that went off in my head. As played I decided to raise the river to $55. I was 3 bet small and paid off to see KQ. These types of hands make me want to puke inside when I review how badly I played it.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
