Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Legislation
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #191  
Old 11-14-2007, 03:19 PM
JPFisher55 JPFisher55 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 963
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

I really like the Professor's comment that ignoring the WTO has costs much higher than any perceived benefit, including the states' rights issue. He was right that the US should obey the WTO decision until the US legally withdraws from its remote gambling commitments. Problem is that our foes know that Congress will never grant the $100+ billion in trade concessions to the rest of the world to legally withdraw these commitments. They know that the negatively affected industries will use their political clout to avoid having to pay the price to lawfully ban online gambling under WTO.
Ms. Duke should have pointed out that if a state permits some form of gambling, then it should permit them all and if a state does not want gambling, then it should prohibit them all. Jay has sometimes indicated that Antiqua might accept that option. Of course, our foes know that politics will prevent most states from prohibiting all types of gambling. Almost all the states receive significant revenues from lotteries and/or casino gambling.
Overall it seems that all our advocates, especially Ms. Duke, did an excellent job on the merits of legalizing online gambling.
Reply With Quote
  #192  
Old 11-14-2007, 03:23 PM
tangled tangled is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 318
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

I noticed that too. Don't know.????
Reply With Quote
  #193  
Old 11-14-2007, 03:24 PM
Capitola Capitola is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 131
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

Anyone know when and where an archived version or transcript will be available? I missed a lot of it.
Reply With Quote
  #194  
Old 11-14-2007, 03:28 PM
KEW KEW is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,883
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Oops Duke is wrong about the states and the WTO.If any states opt out or any sports league opts out, we will still be outside the WTO decision.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree. She should be arguing that no state or federal government should restrict the individual freedom to gamble online in their own home. However, we may be better off hiding the truth about the IGREA until the WTO grants IP sanctions to Antiqua.

[/ QUOTE ]

Weiler posed a hypothetical to Goodlatte along the lines of, "If the technolgy existed to allow remote gaming to only the states in which it was legal, what would be the DOJ's position?" I don't want to put words in his mouth, but doesn't this seem to imply that there might be some workaround room for states rights in regards to the WTO?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think this would've been a good time to introduce the "Commerce" clause and make a statement that by the very nature of the internet the States do not have that right to regulate Internet Gaming...
Reply With Quote
  #195  
Old 11-14-2007, 03:35 PM
DeadMoneyDad DeadMoneyDad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 814
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

Anyone else get their real player stream dumped?


D$D (posted for)
Reply With Quote
  #196  
Old 11-14-2007, 03:48 PM
CompatiblePoker CompatiblePoker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 148
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Anyone know when and where an archived version or transcript will be available? I missed a lot of it.

[/ QUOTE ]

I believe it takes a couple months before they release the transcripts to the public.
Reply With Quote
  #197  
Old 11-14-2007, 03:49 PM
TheEngineer TheEngineer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 2,730
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

Goodlatte sure did look flustered at the end, especially he wanted to debate Annie Duke on states' rights (and lost). What a tool.
Reply With Quote
  #198  
Old 11-14-2007, 04:10 PM
DeadMoneyDad DeadMoneyDad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 814
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Goodlatte sure did look flustered at the end, especially he wanted to debate Annie Duke on states' rights (and lost). What a tool.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is the hearing still on-going?

Still unable to establish a connection.


D$D (posted for)
Reply With Quote
  #199  
Old 11-14-2007, 04:12 PM
Kevmath Kevmath is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Syracuse
Posts: 8,656
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

Hearing ending shortly after 2pm.
Reply With Quote
  #200  
Old 11-14-2007, 04:16 PM
DeadMoneyDad DeadMoneyDad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 814
Default Re: November 14th: House Judiciary Committee Hearing Thread

[ QUOTE ]
Hearing ending shortly after 2pm.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thank you!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.