Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Beats, Brags, and Variance
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #201  
Old 10-20-2007, 10:55 PM
Roy Gonzo Roy Gonzo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Munich
Posts: 66
Default Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT

Just one thing I thought about:

If STEAMROLLER could "deposit" $300 on a random account he could've easily "deposit" large sums on his other accounts or accounts of his friends. Either to "wash" money or to simply betray AP.

Apologies if this has been discused before.
  #202  
Old 10-20-2007, 10:58 PM
N 82 50 24 N 82 50 24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: thepokerdb
Posts: 4,196
Default Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT

[ QUOTE ]
Just one thing I thought about:

If STEAMROLLER could "deposit" $300 on a random account he could've easily "deposit" large sums on his other accounts or accounts of his friends. Either to "wash" money or to simply betray AP.

Apologies if this has been discused before.

[/ QUOTE ]
I have confirmed in a discussion with an insider that certain people had access levels to credit whatever they wanted wherever. But that doesn't mean they could cash it out anywhere.
  #203  
Old 10-20-2007, 11:01 PM
Roy Gonzo Roy Gonzo is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Munich
Posts: 66
Default Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Just one thing I thought about:

If STEAMROLLER could "deposit" $300 on a random account he could've easily "deposit" large sums on his other accounts or accounts of his friends. Either to "wash" money or to simply betray AP.

Apologies if this has been discused before.

[/ QUOTE ]
I have confirmed in a discussion with an insider that certain people had access levels to credit whatever they wanted wherever. But that doesn't mean they could cash it out anywhere.

[/ QUOTE ]

That is why they were chip-dumping ...

And maybe that's why AP was so tolerant towards chip-dumping!
  #204  
Old 10-20-2007, 11:02 PM
SlackerMcFly SlackerMcFly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Ruining forums.
Posts: 2,142
Default Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT

[ QUOTE ]
I have confirmed in a discussion with an insider that certain people had access levels to credit whatever they wanted wherever. But that doesn't mean they could cash it out anywhere.

[/ QUOTE ]

Again, this begs the question of invesigating the "dumpees". See my prior post.

Great work on this, dude! Slacka
  #205  
Old 10-20-2007, 11:03 PM
KurtSF KurtSF is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,983
Default Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT

[ QUOTE ]
Question about the previously announced Gaming Associates audit.....is that still going through?

Or has it been put on the shelf by the KGC and instead AP chose to have two guys fall on swords rather than give the independent auditors the keys to the castle and possibly unearth more incriminating stuff?



[/ QUOTE ]

This doesn't end until there is a complete and thorough investigation that is open and transparent in its evidence and conclusions.
  #206  
Old 10-20-2007, 11:04 PM
Cruzincat Cruzincat is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Maryland
Posts: 200
Default Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT

[ QUOTE ]

I have confirmed in a discussion with an insider that certain people had access levels to credit whatever they wanted wherever. But that doesn't mean they could cash it out anywhere.

[/ QUOTE ]
Does that mean staff had the ability to credit accounts, or did players have credit available?
  #207  
Old 10-20-2007, 11:06 PM
N 82 50 24 N 82 50 24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: thepokerdb
Posts: 4,196
Default Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I have confirmed in a discussion with an insider that certain people had access levels to credit whatever they wanted wherever. But that doesn't mean they could cash it out anywhere.

[/ QUOTE ]
Does that mean staff had the ability to credit accounts, or did players have credit available?

[/ QUOTE ]
Certain staff could credit accounts. But they were still reviewed like anyone upon cashout (at least, that's what I'm told).
  #208  
Old 10-20-2007, 11:06 PM
adanthar adanthar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Intrepidly Reporting
Posts: 14,174
Default Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT

The GA audit is going through, Adam Small is gonna supposedly be in there observing it, etc.
  #209  
Old 10-20-2007, 11:07 PM
PartyGirlUK PartyGirlUK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 10,995
Default Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT

Who is Adam Small? How legit are the GA?
  #210  
Old 10-20-2007, 11:08 PM
mattnxtc mattnxtc is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 2,649
Default Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I have confirmed in a discussion with an insider that certain people had access levels to credit whatever they wanted wherever. But that doesn't mean they could cash it out anywhere.

[/ QUOTE ]
Does that mean staff had the ability to credit accounts, or did players have credit available?

[/ QUOTE ]
Certain staff could credit accounts. But they were still reviewed like anyone upon cashout (at least, that's what I'm told).

[/ QUOTE ]

Is this where the chip dumping is going to come into play to get the money out of the site?
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.