|
|
#101
10-20-2007, 08:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT
[ QUOTE ]
Two people will be implicated here, you can probably guess who. One is going to be removed from online poker forever and one is going be removed for a fair amount of time. [/ QUOTE ] How does one become "removed from online poker"? gg |
|
#102
10-20-2007, 08:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT
no more clicking fingers?
|
|
#103
10-20-2007, 08:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Two people will be implicated here, you can probably guess who. One is going to be removed from online poker forever and one is going be removed for a fair amount of time. [/ QUOTE ] How does one become "removed from online poker"? gg [/ QUOTE ] By the KGC as I understand it. |
|
#105
10-20-2007, 08:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT
Could there be multiple wrongdoings/truths in this case ?
- The cover-up can't be denied and justifies by itself all the problems to come for them. - But the initial cheating isn't obvious ? As well as the major chip-dumping in one session (like if the people who cheated were yelling : "hey ! in case you didn't notice the cheating, look at this chip-dumping !". Connect this to the right-front rim of the jet (sept. 4th 2007) that was loose (?) during the take-off and you have a whole new history to dig... It looks like a "Russian dolls" story, doesn't it ? As for the Costa-Rican ISP that was used, probably that a few hundreds could buy the IP history for the incriminated periods of time.. ?? |
|
#106
10-20-2007, 08:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT
[ QUOTE ]
another stupid step by absolute, adanthar, i hope u and others with inside info can counter this, plz bring the pain [/ QUOTE ] Actually, the two people that will be implicated are very high up. I don't think it's a stupid step, they're finally doing the right thing. Someone can lie for a long time, but coming clean is always better late than never. |
|
#107
10-20-2007, 08:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT
El D,
You made me laugh out loud for a good 30 seconds. Nat/all, I think the biggest event that came out of this whole deal was actually the KGC getting off its ass. I'm 100% serious about this. |
|
#108
10-20-2007, 08:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Two people will be implicated here, you can probably guess who. One is going to be removed from online poker forever and one is going be removed for a fair amount of time. [/ QUOTE ] How does one become "removed from online poker"? gg [/ QUOTE ] By the KGC as I understand it. [/ QUOTE ] And this is their what, first, official act. wow Edit: I guess that they offered/promised to pay for GA's audit on Absolute...and they passed gaming regulations last week, I think. So maybe 3rd official act. See Lori's sticky in Internet Gambling. gg |
|
#109
10-20-2007, 08:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT
Well this is good if the 2 ppl are the only 2 ppl involved. It smells that they decided 1 sacrificial lamb wouldn't appease the baying crowds so threw 2 in there.
|
|
#110
10-20-2007, 08:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP thread 87.1 - waiting on the statement ITT
[ QUOTE ]
One is going to be removed from online poker forever and one is going be removed for a fair amount of time. [/ QUOTE ] What does that mean? Removed forever. Sounds scary. And a fair amount of time? What does that mean? Guess we just have to wait for the much anticipated statement. |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
