|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: traz | |||
| Exactly what I expected |
   
|
0 | 0% |
| Pretty much what I expected |
  
|
2 | 8.70% |
| Kinda what I expected |
  
|
2 | 8.70% |
| Not really what I expected |
  
|
11 | 47.83% |
| Definitely not what I expected |
  
|
8 | 34.78% |
| Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#351
09-16-2007, 04:44 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Post deleted by Mat Sklansky
|
|
#352
09-16-2007, 05:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
Wow this is so sick.
It's funny that somebody who is smart enough to figure out a way to hack a site to see everybodys hole cards wouldn't make it look so obvious. |
|
#354
09-16-2007, 05:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
|
|
#355
09-16-2007, 05:24 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
The Mark Seif story has just turned this affair into "really serious mode".
It insinuates that A) Absolute is definitely involved B) It was before the "software update" icfishies plays the bigger stakes limit games on PS, someone needs to find him and have him post here immediately. |
|
#357
09-16-2007, 05:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
Oh yeah and it seems to me that luckylloyd isn't suggesting that AP is directly doing it, but someone with access to the superuser account or the means to create one may have left something for himself in the code for the software upgrade or whatever
|
|
#359
09-16-2007, 05:29 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Beat: Absolute is *actually* rigged (serious) (read me)
though the issue of cheating hasn't been resolved, i think that the suggestion to not play on AP for the moment is probably a good one. stars is doing a reload right now...coincidence? lol.
but seriously, AP's T&C gives them carte blanche to do most anything so if there's any doubt about the deal, perhaps it's time to pass...(and i play >10K hands/month there.) |
|
|
|
Linear Mode
