Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Omaha High
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old 08-23-2007, 05:06 PM
pete fabrizio pete fabrizio is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: big-ass yard
Posts: 2,250
Default Re: credit for nut full house v. credit for quads

[ QUOTE ]
Interesting points.

On the last part: QJ is better because the lock is less frequent (only QQJ). I'm not sure exactly what this means in practical terms (?)--that this player is more likely to be bluffing? or just that you're going to get raised less frequently so that you don't have to worry about it as much?

[/ QUOTE ]

more likely to be bluffing.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.