another Ron Paul thread

[irunnotgood]

Dr. Paul held a press conference with the former head of the Bin Landen CIA unit about the causes of 9.11. The hero of "9/11" campaign is outraged.

http://www.reuters.com/article/topNe...4?pageNumber=1

[Aytumious]

"Know thine enemy" is apparently only understood by Paul amongst most republicans.

I really hope Paul gets a response of some kind.

[irunnotgood]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZGHey7anhI


news clip

[AlexM]

I figured I'd bump a current thread for this rather than start a new, and this one seemed pretty generic, so...

Pollsters Censoring Ron Paul from the States He Would Do Well In; Statistical Analysis

http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/art...ates-polls.html

[Jeffiner99]

[ QUOTE ]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZGHey7anhI


news clip

[/ QUOTE ]

What a piece of propaganda! Do they not think we saw the debates? Do they not think we heard what Ron said. Only the pathetic biased moderator used the word "invited" Ron never claimed we invited anything, just that this is blowback. The unintended consequences of a foreign policy.

[Case Closed]

[ QUOTE ]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZGHey7anhI


news clip

[/ QUOTE ]

What a piece of trash clip.

[mark_foley]

not only did the clip say that Dr. Paul said the US "invited" the attacks but referred to Benito Guilani as "Americas' Mayor"

[Copernicus]

[ QUOTE ]
not only did the clip say that Dr. Paul said the US "invited" the attacks but referred to Benito Guilani as "Americas' Mayor"

[/ QUOTE ]


Uhhh...that is how he has been referred to since 9/11, and is the title of a hatchet job book about him. What hole did you just crawl out of?

Whether RP used the word invited or not that was the implication of his statement. His isolationist views alone are enough to disqualify him for running a country in the 21st century.

[calmB4storm]

Non-Interventionist = / = Isolationist

[Copernicus]

[ QUOTE ]
Non-Interventionist = / = Isolationist

[/ QUOTE ]

In theory, yes. In practice, as the worlds only superpower and dominating the world economy, non-intervention is next to impossible to accomplish without isolationism.

Eg liberals like to cast the Iraq war as "intervention", when, in fact, allowing Iraq to continue on its course under SH would have required isoloationism, because his actions would have far reaching direct consequences for the US.