|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Notre Dame 8-1 | |||
| 1 |
   
|
0 | 0% |
| 2 |
  
|
1 | 2.78% |
| 3 |
  
|
1 | 2.78% |
| 4 |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| 5 |
  
|
1 | 2.78% |
| 6 |
  
|
2 | 5.56% |
| 7 |
|
2 | 5.56% |
| 8 |
|
11 | 30.56% |
| 9 |
|
5 | 13.89% |
| 10 |
|
13 | 36.11% |
| Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#412
10-24-2007, 02:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
it's pretty simple really. there's a majority of us that are very interested and supportive of nat/adanthar going to cr. there's also a bunch of very vocal haters, but that group really has no reason to care. if they want absolute to diagf then they can simply dismiss anything positive that nat/adanthar have to say.
|
|
#413
10-24-2007, 02:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
1) I read threads via email. So when y'all start a new thread without mentioning it in the last thread, I don't realise. Thus, I've just read just about everything.
2) Is there anyone other than coolmoedee who has managed to make 100% of his posts incredibly moronic over such a relatively large sample? Questions That I Would Ask AP: 1) What is the current ownership structure of AP? - tracked back to real persons. 2) What is the current day-to-day management structure of AP? 3) Will it be possible to have one-on-one face time with anyone you want? (ie, you don't want to be followed by a North Korean-esque "guide" all the time) 4) Has AP given thought to employing an independent ombudsman to handle disputes/appeals for players?
|
|
#414
10-24-2007, 02:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
What's this really all about, Nat?
What if they offer you a job?
|
|
#415
10-24-2007, 02:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
Nat, Adan,
I think either of you would be excellent candidates for going down to CR to see what is being done and to get face to face answers that we all want. Please ignore the 500 post n00bs concerned that you are gonna be bribed into saying everything is a-ok, do what YOU think is best for the investigation and resolving the issues.
|
|
#416
10-24-2007, 02:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
[ QUOTE ]
What's this really all about, Nat? What if they offer you a job? [/ QUOTE ] Can a mod edit his title into something really retarded?
|
|
#417
10-24-2007, 02:12 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Ill ask again. Does ANYONE think that AP would actually invite him if they werent certain that he would leave and give them a good image.* *As to how that would happen, I am not commenting. [/ QUOTE ] It'd be a better image than what random, uninformed people have been posting all over this thread, so I don't find this disturbing at all. [/ QUOTE ] Better? Yes we are def in agreement. My point was that not nearly enough people seem at all curious as to the whole chain of events. Stonewall Stonewall Lies Stonewall Lack of info Stonewall ***HEY, come on down!! A "better" image is exactly what they KNOW they will get out of this, and thats exactly why it shouldnt be done. They should get a FULL AUDIT by a TRUELY INDEPENDANT AUDITOR. All this [censored] talk of the GA audit and inviting people down seems to have gotten the conversation away from what that...which is certainly what the majority was demanding a few threads ago. You guys are letting them win. Edit- For the record, I am down ~13-15k to the cheat accounts...and those are only the known ones. So that puts us in the same camp. Have you gotten your cashout/s yet? [/ QUOTE ] Its an insult to Nat that you'll assume that he'd be taken advantaged of by AP. /arg. [/ QUOTE ] yes because Nat is an all seeing deity that can instantly detect ANYTHING out of the ordinary ~_~ Edit- IM NOT [censored] SAYING THAT HELL TAKE A BRIBE. jesus [censored] christ
|
|
#418
10-24-2007, 02:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
[ QUOTE ]
Its an insult to Nat that you'll assume that he'd be taken advantaged of by AP. /arg. [/ QUOTE ] no one reasonable is saying he is gonna be "taken advantage of." rather, we think he will simply be ineffective bc he doesnt have the resources, skills and experience to conduct a full audit and bc ap will not give him full disclosure. he will see what ap wants him to see and ap will give rehearsed nonimplicating answers. regardless, im all for him going down there. its better than nothing and while its unlikely he uncovers hard evidence he will certainly be able to pick up on some aspects of the operation.
|
|
#419
10-24-2007, 02:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Its an insult to Nat that you'll assume that he'd be taken advantaged of by AP. /arg. [/ QUOTE ] no one reasonable is saying he is gonna be "taken advantage of." rather, we think he will simply be ineffective bc he doesnt have the resources, skills and experience to conduct a full audit and bc ap will not give him full disclosure. he will see what ap wants him to see and ap will give rehearsed nonimplicating answers. regardless, im all for him going down there. its better than nothing and while its unlikely he uncovers hard evidence he will certainly be able to pick up on some aspects of the operation. [/ QUOTE ] this sounds like a reasonable assessment of the situation.
|
|
#420
10-24-2007, 02:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AP Visit: I\'m going to Costa Rica
[ QUOTE ]
What's this really all about, Nat? What if they offer you a job? [/ QUOTE ] this is, like, so stupid that it's past insulting and out the other side. at least, if you were referring to me, the offer in question would constitute more than 2% of my net worth, but no, you managed to address a guy who owns 20% of Bluff Media. well played.
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
