Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-30-2007, 01:06 PM
willw9 willw9 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: where momma keeps the peanut butter
Posts: 4,235
Default Re: need a plan vs a 2+2er

Um I didn't...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-30-2007, 01:15 PM
Nick Royale Nick Royale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sverige
Posts: 6,815
Default Re: need a plan vs a 2+2er

Tbh I don't really like any of our options (on the flop), I think b/f, c/c and crai all have benefits and which of them we should chose is depending on our read of the 2p2er.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-30-2007, 01:19 PM
willw9 willw9 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: where momma keeps the peanut butter
Posts: 4,235
Default Re: need a plan vs a 2+2er

FWIW I think i like c/c because of the reasons bilbo outlined. I rarely rarely just call the bet (unless I have AA/KK, which is possible, but it's definetely a small part of my range here); I'm either raising or folding. Therefore b/f sucks.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-30-2007, 01:27 PM
rakes.a.beach rakes.a.beach is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Abs. Poka @ UCLA
Posts: 1,043
Default Re: need a plan vs a 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
Tbh I don't really like any of our options (on the flop), I think b/f, c/c and crai all have benefits and which of them we should chose is depending on our read of the 2p2er.

[/ QUOTE ]

they're very close in EV. I don't like crai cuz it doesn't make much sense and will get looked up a lot.

I think b/f is better than c/c in because you don't have to play OOP for the hand.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-30-2007, 04:16 PM
Noam Chomsky Noam Chomsky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 919
Default Re: need a plan vs a 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Tbh I don't really like any of our options (on the flop), I think b/f, c/c and crai all have benefits and which of them we should chose is depending on our read of the 2p2er.

[/ QUOTE ]

they're very close in EV. I don't like crai cuz it doesn't make much sense and will get looked up a lot.

I think b/f is better than c/c in because you don't have to play OOP for the hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

You act like crai is a bluff. It's really not. We're not worried about getting looked up with crai, we're not trying to fold out AQ-AA, sets or two pair. It's done partly for balance, partly because it's the only real way to protect your hand and your equity in this pot which stands up quite well vs his range both for calling pf and betting when checked to. Another benefit is that you will most definitely get looked up by worse on some occasions on this board. When they fold, you got them to pump dead money into the pot and then fold which is a pretty gross error. When they call with better, you have the gutter and the bd/fd which people discount too much and is what gives you sooo much flexibility in lines on this flop vs a good, tight aggressive opponent.

I'd much rather b/c (and probably would about 65% of the time) and embrace variance here than b/f. As I said previously, doing anything at all that has you folding this hand on this flop vs a typical 2p2 tag is about the only mistake you can make.

I threw together what I think is a pretty tight range of hands that a typical tag is calling pf some percentage of the time and shoving this flop with just about always and I'd guess that they are going to b/c pretty darn close to the same range here when checked to them. Unless my range or super basic math estimations are way off, it's at a minimum a small mistake to b/f. Again, this is a tight range and as you expand it and even include some hands that he probably shoves sometimes and folds others (like smaller pairs, AK that isn't clubs, AJ/A9 type hands) I think bet/folding really starts to become a significant mistake.
Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

68,310 games 0.005 secs 13,662,000 games/sec

Board: Tc 8c Qh

Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied

Hand 0: 42.477% 41.15% 01.33% 28108 908.00 { JcJs }

Hand 1: 57.523% 56.19% 01.33% 38386 908.00 { 88+, AcKc, AQs, ATs, KJs+, QJs, JTs, T9s, 98s, 7c6c, 6c5c, AQo, KQo }
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-30-2007, 04:54 PM
pineapple888 pineapple888 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Getting rivered by idiots
Posts: 6,558
Default Re: need a plan vs a 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

68,310 games 0.005 secs 13,662,000 games/sec

Board: Tc 8c Qh

Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied

Hand 0: 42.477% 41.15% 01.33% 28108 908.00 { JcJs }

Hand 1: 57.523% 56.19% 01.33% 38386 908.00 { 88+, AcKc, AQs, ATs, KJs+, QJs, JTs, T9s, 98s, 7c6c, 6c5c, AQo, KQo }

[/ QUOTE ]

You must play in some amazingly loose games.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-30-2007, 05:06 PM
Noam Chomsky Noam Chomsky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 919
Default Re: need a plan vs a 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Text results appended to pokerstove.txt

68,310 games 0.005 secs 13,662,000 games/sec

Board: Tc 8c Qh

Dead:

equity win tie pots won pots tied

Hand 0: 42.477% 41.15% 01.33% 28108 908.00 { JcJs }

Hand 1: 57.523% 56.19% 01.33% 38386 908.00 { 88+, AcKc, AQs, ATs, KJs+, QJs, JTs, T9s, 98s, 7c6c, 6c5c, AQo, KQo }

[/ QUOTE ]

You must play in some amazingly loose games.

[/ QUOTE ]

lol?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-01-2007, 02:25 AM
rakes.a.beach rakes.a.beach is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Abs. Poka @ UCLA
Posts: 1,043
Default Re: need a plan vs a 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
Hand 1: 57.523% 56.19% 01.33% 38386 908.00 { 88+, AcKc, AQs, ATs, KJs+, QJs, JTs, T9s, 98s, 7c6c, 6c5c, AQo, KQo }

[/ QUOTE ]

You are bluffing when you're check/shoving flop. do you really expect a bunch of worse hands to call?

T9s, JTs, 89s make up a very small part of his calling range. AK is the only real hand I see calling us when behind.

Villain will check behind hands like AT, JT, that we beat. unless villain stabs at every pot, and there's no history in this case, I don't see crai being profitable.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.