|
|
#1
10-03-2007, 12:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Great Chess Game of the Week: Atalik v Miles, 1993
|
|
#2
10-03-2007, 01:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Great Chess Game of the Week: Atalik v Miles, 1993
who is the annotator? He sucks.
|
|
#3
10-07-2007, 09:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Great Chess Game of the Week: Atalik v Miles, 1993
|
|
#4
10-08-2007, 10:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Great Chess Game of the Week: Atalik v Miles, 1993
White proceeds from a small advantage on move 12 to getting smashed in <30 moves without supposedly making a mistake anywhere. Sloppy annotation (pretty game though).
[ QUOTE ] Without going into a very detailed analysis, I will simply tell you that all of the next few moves are the best - for both parties. [/ QUOTE ] ducy of chess annotation [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] this is my favorite game: Polugaevsky-Nezhmetdinov
|
|
#5
10-08-2007, 03:48 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Great Chess Game of the Week: Atalik v Miles, 1993
[ QUOTE ]
White proceeds from a small advantage on move 12 to getting smashed in <30 moves without supposedly making a mistake anywhere. Sloppy annotation (pretty game though). [ QUOTE ] Without going into a very detailed analysis, I will simply tell you that all of the next few moves are the best - for both parties. [/ QUOTE ] ducy of chess annotation [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] this is my favorite game: Polugaevsky-Nezhmetdinov [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, I've referenced that before. My favorite I think.
|
|
#6
10-09-2007, 01:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Great Chess Game of the Week: Atalik v Miles, 1993
White makes some pretty serious mistakes in this game, right? I know it's okay to be a fair bit behind in development in a closed position, but white is way behind and then compounds this problem by helping black open the center while his king is still stuck there ... I like 9. 0-0-0 better than Rd1 (althought they're both playable), but that's just the earliest deviation that would have saved white a whole game's worth of misery.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
