Is autocorrelation something you should pay attention too?

[donkeykong2]

Well, the question is pretty much self-explaining. Do you think people are more likely to bluff after having been caught(or at least active) or will they be less likely to bluff? Assume we know the persons usual style, do we give him more credit if he hasnt done much so far in a session and we have to determine if he is bluffing now do we give him more or less credit?

[keikiwai]

if they're standard, they're more likely to switch it up

if they're good they're more likely to not switch it up

[Xanta]

[ QUOTE ]

if they're bad, they're more likely to not switch it up

if they're standard, they're more likely to switch it up

if they're good they're more likely to not switch it up

[/ QUOTE ]

[donkeykong2]

alright, that sounds reasonable.

[0evg0]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

if they're bad, they're more likely to not switch it up

if they're standard, they're more likely to switch it up

if they're good they're more likely to not switch it up

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm just bumping this because i've quoted this post 3 times today to 3 different people who said they decided not to 3bet a perfectly good 3betting hand (QJs, 66, etc) because they've been too aggr vs someone

this is one of the wiser posts ive seen in a while and deserves to be seen

[prodonkey]

I feel this way a lot.. i'm like I should 3 bet here.. but then I'm thinking I just raised the 2-3 previous hands too, so I'll do dumb crap like cold call with AQ/AK

[Burcak]

I guess I am std. I feel exactly same with QJs etc.

However with AK in that situation I'd just move in if reraised, guess I can be called by stupid hands. But if I don't want to move in I usually back off.