respond to my january article please

[Shandrax]

The article is very thought-provoking. It showed me that my play is way too stereotype.

I like the article a lot, but I would have also liked it to be a bit longer with more examples.

On a rating of 1-5 (5 being best) I'd give it a 4 and only because it's a bit short.

[HOWMANY]

Threeve.

[Beavis68]

[ QUOTE ]
This was so bad. I can't believe I wasted 5mins of my life reading it.

Am only interested to hear of the colorful stories Ray reserves for his friends.

I give it a fair 0 but look foraward to a decent article by Ray with at least something to glean from!

[/ QUOTE ]

yes, two hands you think are borin and one of them you didnt even remember. WTF?

need some easy money?

1

[Ray Zee]

i guess you are butt head then. you should know me by now and look thru the trees to see the forest. too bad. and btw i dont get paid for writing the articles, so maybe thats why they are so bad. but really i am doing the best i can.

[No_Mercy]

Easily impressed, are we?

[No_Mercy]

Good points.

[Beavis68]

[ QUOTE ]
i guess you are butt head then. you should know me by now and look thru the trees to see the forest. too bad. and btw i dont get paid for writing the articles, so maybe thats why they are so bad. but really i am doing the best i can.

[/ QUOTE ]

wow, that was really creative- no one makes the beavie/butthead connection, I guess I am a butthead for bothering to read your article and responde to it.

you asked for comments, I gave you mine. That was the impression I got. like you felt like you "had" to write something.


How am I supposed to know you by now?

I never said you were a bad writer. This article was something you stated yourself was uniteresting.

Why go to name calling?

[yellowjack]

[ QUOTE ]
Why go to name calling?

[/ QUOTE ]

your name is beavis

[Red Stine]

No Ray Zee article--no read.