ratholers unite

ski · #1 09-21-2007, 12:12 PM

Hey, was ratholin 25/50 the other day and one of the Poker stars pros gave me his e-mail and asked if I could write an agruement on why PS should not have a bigger max buyin.

Going to take the time to write a proper arguement. Feel free to contribute using my PM or this thread..

mntbikr15 · #2 09-21-2007, 12:13 PM

lol sooo awesome

Supwithbates · #3 09-21-2007, 03:19 PM

Because I like to unexploitably shove coinflip hands over the wide range of preflop raisers. When I win a flip I leave so as not to allow my play to become exploitable, or even worse, force me to play postflop where skill becomes a factor.

Clayton · #4 09-21-2007, 03:22 PM

my faith in PS having a bigger max buy in has increased seeing this thread

Kirbynator · #5 09-21-2007, 03:29 PM

death penalty

ImsaKidd · #6 09-21-2007, 03:33 PM

Which pro?

One argument would be that they would be losing 5k/month in rake from me alone.

goofyballer · #7 09-21-2007, 03:34 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Which pro?

One argument would be that they would be losing 5k/month in rake from me alone.

[/ QUOTE ]

Man, if all the pro shortstackers left PS that would just destroy their bottom line!!!

teddyFBI · #8 09-21-2007, 03:38 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Which pro?

One argument would be that they would be losing 5k/month in rake from me alone.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm just curious -- how do ppl rathole on Stars?
I thought they have the "timeout" refractory period.
Or is it just that there's so many tables to choose from, that they can rotate among them until their timeout is up.

CalledDownLight · #9 09-21-2007, 03:41 PM

I wouldn't mind proofing it if you want.

Stinger88 · #10 09-21-2007, 03:41 PM

I'd play PS 10 times more if they raised min and got 25/50 6max