Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Are you down
YES, AWESOME 10 66.67%
NO, BASTARD 5 33.33%
Voters: 15. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 09-18-2007, 08:42 PM
XXXNoahXXX XXXNoahXXX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Boston
Posts: 8,159
Default Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko

i think some people are retarded.

if he ever branded it (odds 1%) the odds of cooperstown putting it on display is 0%.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 09-19-2007, 01:21 AM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Evolving Day-By-Day
Posts: 18,508
Default Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko

blow it up like the Bartman ball


seriously, this ball won't make the hall if he brands it

it will be the last homerun Bonds hit that is the record anyway
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 09-19-2007, 02:14 AM
TheNoodleMan TheNoodleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not using the back button
Posts: 6,873
Default Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko

[ QUOTE ]
How do you feel about the possibility that Babe Ruth went his entire career without facing a single pitcher who would make a MLB roster under the current conditions?

If you don't believe me, think for a minute or two about the size of the player pool that MLB drew from then and compare it to now.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you don't think that Walter Johnson or Lefty Grove would make an MLB roster today then you are a moron.
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 09-19-2007, 08:17 AM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 13,859
Default Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko

It's not like Ruth faced them a lot, though. By the time Ruth was exclusively a hitter (1919) Walter was in his last year of dominance. Lefty Grove wouldn't become dominant until 1930, where Ruth had about 4 big years left in him.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 09-19-2007, 11:43 AM
TheNoodleMan TheNoodleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Not using the back button
Posts: 6,873
Default Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko

Jack,
Your point is fair but has absolutely no bearing on how unbelievably stupid the previous statement was.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:01 PM
MikeyPatriot MikeyPatriot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,301
Default Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko

[ QUOTE ]
Marc Ecko is a serious attention whore.

If he puts * on it, the HOF is just going to put it facing the back of the display case, ldo.

[/ QUOTE ]

Multiple brandings FTW.
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:21 PM
talentdeficit talentdeficit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Posts: 2,323
Default Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko

marc ecko is a dick. if he wants to brand the ball, he should do it and not hide behind a poll.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 09-19-2007, 02:00 PM
vhawk01 vhawk01 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: GHoFFANMWYD
Posts: 9,098
Default Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How do you feel about the possibility that Babe Ruth went his entire career without facing a single pitcher who would make a MLB roster under the current conditions?

If you don't believe me, think for a minute or two about the size of the player pool that MLB drew from then and compare it to now.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you don't think that Walter Johnson or Lefty Grove would make an MLB roster today then you are a moron.

[/ QUOTE ]

I said possibility. Obviously some of them would. The point was to make him realize that, with the RIDICULOUS increase in the available player pool, players are way, way, way better now than they were 70 years ago.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 09-19-2007, 02:34 PM
DonkeyKongSr DonkeyKongSr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Home of Best Hockey Team Ever
Posts: 3,487
Default Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How do you feel about the possibility that Babe Ruth went his entire career without facing a single pitcher who would make a MLB roster under the current conditions?

If you don't believe me, think for a minute or two about the size of the player pool that MLB drew from then and compare it to now.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you don't think that Walter Johnson or Lefty Grove would make an MLB roster today then you are a moron.

[/ QUOTE ]

I said possibility. Obviously some of them would. The point was to make him realize that, with the RIDICULOUS increase in the available player pool, players are way, way, way better now than they were 70 years ago.

[/ QUOTE ]

And by "player pool" you mean "performance enhancing drugs", amirite?
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 09-19-2007, 02:43 PM
vhawk01 vhawk01 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: GHoFFANMWYD
Posts: 9,098
Default Re: The Fate of #756 by Marc Ecko

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
How do you feel about the possibility that Babe Ruth went his entire career without facing a single pitcher who would make a MLB roster under the current conditions?

If you don't believe me, think for a minute or two about the size of the player pool that MLB drew from then and compare it to now.

[/ QUOTE ]

If you don't think that Walter Johnson or Lefty Grove would make an MLB roster today then you are a moron.

[/ QUOTE ]

I said possibility. Obviously some of them would. The point was to make him realize that, with the RIDICULOUS increase in the available player pool, players are way, way, way better now than they were 70 years ago.

[/ QUOTE ]

And by "player pool" you mean "performance enhancing drugs", amirite?

[/ QUOTE ]

Again, thats obviously only legit if you are talking about putting in a player that would refuse to use anything. Its a bit of a stretch to think Babe Ruth wouldn't be using steroids if he were playing today.

But no, I wasn't even talking about that. Baseball, during Ruth's era, drew from a tiny pool. The population of the US in 1920 was 106 million. Some percentage of that was black or otherwise not white. Thats a fairly small pool of players. The US population now over 300 million. All races can play. Add in the hundreds of millions of people in Japan, Korea, Dominican Republic, Venezuala, and so on. The player pool is many, many times larger.

PEDs are a neutral issue, since they help all the other players just as much as they would have helped Ruth. You can toss that out. Globalization, integration, and just the general increase in population since the time of Ruth, but also since the time of Aaron, guarantees that the players today are much tougher.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.