*** OFFICIAL 11/29/07 NFL Thursday GAME THREAD (GB @ DAL)***

[Benny Foldem]

man the NFL should get on that.. stupid

[kyro]

[ QUOTE ]
kyro you put a lot of time in for a $5 unit...that kind of discipline will ultimately propel your game.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well mostly I just hate my job.

[fmlycar]

i live ~20 miles outside of milwaukee and I will be getting it on ABC fwiw

btw go pack -7 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

[kyro]

[ QUOTE ]

btw go pack -7

[/ QUOTE ]

You need to lineshop better.

[murphstahoe]

one of you math weenies has the answer - which is the better line

GB +7 -110
GB +7.5 -122

And for FF - pick 2 of 3 - Grant, J Lewis, M Jones-Drew (i get points for return TDs but no yards towards bonus)
?

[stylos]

[ QUOTE ]
one of you math weenies has the answer - which is the better line

GB +7 -110
GB +7.5 -122


[/ QUOTE ]

Posted by someone earlier: http://www.sbrforum.com/Betting+Tool...alculator.aspx

[funkytown]

I'm taking Dallas -7 (bodog. Favre 0-8 in Dallas su and 1-7 ATS there

[kyro]

[ QUOTE ]
hmm...beat:

MIA and STL, a combined 2-18
a pretty bad CHI team
a bad MIN team
overrated NYG's twice
PHI-bad
WAS, decent win there
NYJ....

combined record of opponents that they beat 36-61

GB: 52-57


[/ QUOTE ]

Well yeah, that's because Dallas lost to a an undefeated team and the Packers lost to a team below .500. That's some pretty dishonest manipulation of data right there. Losing to a bad team is as much of a barometer of a team's ability as beating a bad team. The Cowboys and Packers have played pretty similar schedules. Packers have had a slightly harder schedule in pure win-loss, Cowboys with a slightly harder (though possibly skewed by the NE game) from a DVOA standpoint.

[stakman1011]

NFL Network just announced both KGB and Woodson will not be playing fwiw.

[murphstahoe]

pack +7.5 -117 (WSEX)