|
|
#1
06-09-2006, 04:29 PM
|
|||
|
|||
$50NL 88 vs LAG turn decision
As I said CO is a total maniac after 30 hands or so he is up 2 BI's and his stats are 84.38/23.18/1.8
Poker Room skin No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $0.25/$0.50 5 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $51.45 CO: $132.65 Button: $56.50 Hero: $45.50 BB: $50.00 Pre-flop: (5 players) Hero is SB with 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] UTG folds, CO calls $0.5 <font color="#aaaaaa">(pot was $0.75)</font>, Button calls $0.5 <font color="#aaaaaa">(pot was $1.25)</font>, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $2.5</font>, BB folds, CO calls $2.25 <font color="#aaaaaa">(pot was $3.75)</font>, Button folds. Flop: 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] ($6, 2 players) <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $5</font>, CO calls $5 <font color="#aaaaaa">(pot was $11)</font>. Turn: 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($16, 2 players) <font color="#cc0000">Hero bets $10</font>, <font color="#cc0000">CO raises to $20</font>, Hero? Also, should i have just check called down after the flop? too keep the pot smaller? 
|
|
#2
06-09-2006, 04:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $50NL 88 vs LAG turn decision
I would check/raise the turn all in, given the play push now. This is a great semibluff card for a 3/7/2 spades/2 diamonds. I would expect you to have the best hand the majority of the time this happens.
I think just calling preflop OOP is a great idea aswell. True
|
|
#3
06-09-2006, 04:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $50NL 88 vs LAG turn decision
[ QUOTE ]
... I think just calling preflop OOP is a great idea aswell. [/ QUOTE ] my soul purpose of raising preflop was to isolate the CO limper. edit - I agree though
|
|
#4
06-09-2006, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $50NL 88 vs LAG turn decision
[ QUOTE ]
my soul purpose of raising preflop was to isolate the CO limper. edit - I agree though [/ QUOTE ] The button also limped. I would imagine that if you were button this would be fine (even with an extra limper). I think OOP it is going to be harder to extract money as LAGs can play well with more information and put you to tough decisions. On this board, the decision seems simple, imagine a board like J97 2 flush. True
|
|
#5
06-09-2006, 04:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $50NL 88 vs LAG turn decision
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] my soul purpose of raising preflop was to isolate the CO limper. edit - I agree though [/ QUOTE ] The button also limped. I would imagine that if you were button this would be fine (even with an extra limper). I think OOP it is going to be harder to extract money as LAGs can play well with more information and put you to tough decisions. On this board, the decision seems simple, imagine a board like J97 2 flush. True [/ QUOTE ] Yeah i dont like this iso-raise OOP much anymore.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
