|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100 - Tens, completely butchered OOP?
i would check raise the flop, it seems like you are justifying making a bad play by saying that it only gets called by better hands, when what you want is to either take down the pot there or realize you're beat
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100 - Tens, completely butchered OOP?
You might want to post this in SS forum, 6 max plays a lot different to full ring.
As played I either donkbet for 8-10 on the flop or checkraise, cheaper and safer way to control pot size than playing 2 or more streets oop. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100 - Tens, completely butchered OOP?
If you choose to take a passive line, take a passive line. C/c turn and c/c river. Check-raise is bad. It puts us into an incredibly awkward spot on the turn and river if he flat calls, and forces us to fold the winner a bunch of times when he shoves. I'd rather check raise here with 33 than TT.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100 - Tens, completely butchered OOP?
c/r flop or, reraise PF. Villain raised from the button with only one limper in front of him, so he can raise with a pretty wide range here. As your OOP the whole hand, you wouldn't be unhappy to take the pot down right there.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100 - Tens, completely butchered OOP?
[ QUOTE ]
i would check raise the flop, it seems like you are justifying making a bad play by saying that it only gets called by better hands, when what you want is to either take down the pot there or realize you're beat [/ QUOTE ] |
|
|