Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-22-2007, 10:49 AM
DennisGPunkt DennisGPunkt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 94
Default 88, This was a big spewage, right?

Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.05/$0.10 Blinds - 4 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

no reads
SB: $11.85
Hero (BB): $9.70
UTG: $6.85
BTN: $9.65

Preflop: Hero is dealt 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (4 Players)
UTG calls $0.10, BTN folds, SB calls $0.05, <font color="red">Hero raises to $0.65</font>, UTG calls $0.55, SB calls $0.55

Flop: ($1.95) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (3 Players)
SB checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $1.40</font>, UTG folds, <font color="red">SB raises to $2.80</font>, <font color="red">Hero raises all-in to $9.05</font>, SB calls $6.25

Turn: ($20.05) J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

River: ($20.05) 2[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

Pot Size: $20.05 ($1 Rake)

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-22-2007, 10:57 AM
Jouster777 Jouster777 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LAG right, nit left
Posts: 1,825
Default Re: 88, This was a big spewage, right?

its not spewage as insane spewage but yeah...push or fold flop given the wetness and readless - fold it
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-22-2007, 10:58 AM
xeanatic xeanatic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NL100
Posts: 531
Default Re: 88, This was a big spewage, right?

prob fold to his minraise here, not much you are beating takes this line
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-22-2007, 11:08 AM
Go_BroKe Go_BroKe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Austria ftw!
Posts: 397
Default Re: 88, This was a big spewage, right?

I don't think it's spew. I play it the same against an NL 10 unknown. They can have a wider range than sets only like draws, TP etc.

I don't think he has 2pair here who plays 53 or 75 or 73?Against a heart draw, we have good equity. Against FD + Overcards we flip a coin.Against a set we are a huge underdog.

I am unsure if we should just call and get it in on a safe turn (Would push up our equity against draws). But there are a lot of cards, I don't want to see on the turn.So I am [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-22-2007, 11:55 AM
SMACK BOOTY SMACK  BOOTY is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Hope is a bad hedge.
Posts: 242
Default Re: 88, This was a big spewage, right?

This is min spewage. You have nothing on me. It may not be the optimum way to play this hand, but I see lots of people play mid PP overs the same way, especially live. You are WA of A7 for instance, but behind or coin flip with many other hands villain would play after being raised. The big flop call and min raise would have slowed me down; if you call the raise, you are basically committing yourself to the hand.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-22-2007, 12:31 PM
DennisGPunkt DennisGPunkt is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 94
Default Re: 88, This was a big spewage, right?

[ QUOTE ]
This is min spewage. You have nothing on me. It may not be the optimum way to play this hand, but I see lots of people play mid PP overs the same way, especially live. You are WA of A7 for instance, but behind or coin flip with many other hands villain would play after being raised. The big flop call and min raise would have slowed me down; if you call the raise, you are basically committing yourself to the hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Hmm... I thought i might be way ahead of all the draws, and the only things that are beating me here are 46 or a set, MAYBE a two pair.

and i didnt expect him to call here with FD + Overs, as he could not be sure wether his Overs are clean outs. Also the fact the he limped/cold called made more convinced that this might be a some kind of SC/PP.

Basically i tried to play this hand as if I had Aces, which I would have shoved here aswell, expecting some kind of draws calling me (its 10NL).

But maybe thats one of my leaks [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-22-2007, 12:41 PM
bung bung is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: I\'m not a donkey, I\'m a horse.......
Posts: 726
Default Re: 88, This was a big spewage, right?

I think the flop is usually a fold. If we assign villain a range, we'll see that we're behind here.

Usually a good draw, overpair, or set right?

46, 55, 77, 33, 99, TT, AJs, ATs, KQs, 6h8h......
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-22-2007, 12:42 PM
corsakh corsakh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kitty said what?
Posts: 3,991
Default Re: 88, This was a big spewage, right?

Its not terrible. Villain dependent. Close.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.