Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 08-17-2007, 11:42 PM
KRS ONE KRS ONE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 89
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

OMFG Saturday morning games are AMAZING.

Why did no one tell me?
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 08-18-2007, 06:16 AM
KRS ONE KRS ONE is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 89
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

SO i sat down to just play a couple of tables before I had to go out. This was my very first hand.

How on earth do I ever win this?

Party Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.10/$0.25 Blinds - 6 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $32.82
BB: $30.11
UTG: $19.26
MP: $5.47
Hero (CO): $25.00
BTN: $18.88

Preflop: Hero is dealt Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (6 Players)
UTG calls $0.25, MP calls $0.25, <font color="red">Hero raises to $1.25</font>, BTN calls $1.25, 2 folds, UTG calls $1.00, MP calls $1.00

Flop: ($5.35) 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 6[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (4 Players)
UTG checks, MP checks, <font color="red">Hero bets $3.75</font>, <font color="red">BTN raises all-in to $17.63</font>, 2 folds, Hero calls $13.88
Uncalled bet of $0.00 returned to Hero

Turn: ($40.61) 7[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

River: ($40.61) 5[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

Pot Size: $40.61 ($2.53 Rake)

BTN had 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (a pair of Eights) and LOST (-$18.88)
Hero had Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (a pair of Queens) and WON (+$19.20)

Party Poker - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.10/$0.25 Blinds - 5 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $19.86
BB: $4.22
UTG: $41.70
CO: $32.72
BTN: $29.76

Preflop: is dealt (5 Players)
<font color="red">UTG raises to $1.00</font>, CO folds, BTN calls $1.00, SB calls $0.90, BB calls $0.75

Flop: ($4) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (4 Players)
SB checks, BB checks, <font color="red">UTG bets $3.25</font>, BTN folds, SB calls $3.25, BB folds

Turn: ($10.50) 5[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players)
SB checks, UTG checks

River: ($10.50) 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">SB bets all-in for $15.61</font>, UTG calls $15.61

Pot Size: $41.72 ($2.50 Rake)

UTG had A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (a pair of Aces) and WON (+$19.36)
SB had Q[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (high card Ace) and LOST (-$19.86)


+~2bi's in less than 40 hands.

If only it was always that simple.

ty party.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 08-18-2007, 09:22 AM
deehell deehell is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: England
Posts: 27
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

Anyone have any stats on Mopsiiiii, I have him at 18/12/3.1 over 800 hands.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 08-18-2007, 09:44 AM
Fiksdal Fiksdal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,444
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
iamtonismom is a 100NL player? Hes playing 25NL now, and not doing so well either..

[/ QUOTE ]

maybe he was just taking a shot, but i saw him at 100nl for sure. and yes he sucks.

[/ QUOTE ]

yeah I have played 100nL with him. kinda funny, both him and a guy called something like "tony1123" were at my table together. I loled.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 08-18-2007, 10:59 AM
chillout85 chillout85 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London/Loughborough, UK
Posts: 22
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

I played with Partyps once, and he was playing like the biggest maniac ive ever seen, he must've been bored or something because he was raising pretty much 100% of his hands preflop and potting every flop. since then he's been playing a bit more orthodox... Anyone played with me before? (chillout85)

also, bradcona who i played nl50 with recently seemed a bit of a fish, but one who got extremely lucky repeatedly...u know the type I mean
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 08-18-2007, 11:47 AM
Rah22 Rah22 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

Partyps has a weird LAG style. Ive seen him with 100+$ on some tables(25$NL) while loosing few stacks in an hour on the other. Ive seen him playing for whole stacks with TPGK.Hes usually folding air tho i think. I think more bluffing than C-bet is no good vs him.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 08-18-2007, 12:15 PM
payoff wizard payoff wizard is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 228
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

[ QUOTE ]
50nl is ALOT tougher than 25nl, moreso then people have led me to believe...which isn't too good..

Anyone else agree? or disagree

[/ QUOTE ]

Having recently gone from robusto to busto, I am now staked and rebuilding at 25NL and 50NL. From what I have seen, more players at 50NL play back at aggression, but those that do do so terribly and recklessly. Thus, 50NL may be tougher if you are a weak player, but, if you have a reasonable amount of balls and brains, then it is WAY more profitable (IMHO).
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 08-18-2007, 12:16 PM
traz traz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sleeping on stacks
Posts: 19,775
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
50nl is ALOT tougher than 25nl, moreso then people have led me to believe...which isn't too good..

Anyone else agree? or disagree

[/ QUOTE ]

Having recently gone from robusto to busto, I am now staked and rebuilding at 25NL and 50NL. From what I have seen, more players at 50NL play back at aggression, but those that do do so terribly and recklessly. Thus, 50NL may be tougher if you are a weak player, but, if you have a reasonable amount of balls and brains, then it is WAY more profitable (IMHO).

[/ QUOTE ]

I find this to be very true. At 25nl, you can get away with being very weak, but if you bring that over to 50 you'll get blown off by the aggression.

It's definitely more aggressive, but bad-aggressive.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 08-18-2007, 01:56 PM
chillout85 chillout85 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: London/Loughborough, UK
Posts: 22
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

Yeah I agree, you need to pick your spots a bit more carefully at NL50. It took me a while to adjust after beating NL25 for a while but once you've settled into your comfort zone you'll see there are still plenty of donks just a slightly different more aggressive breed than the type found at NL25
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 08-18-2007, 07:10 PM
RedBarracuda RedBarracuda is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: anywhere
Posts: 97
Default Re: Official Party Regulars Thread: Part II

it feels like Party has bunch of bad tighters at NL25 right now..
they know they should be tight and they are tight, but they dont know when to let go of a hand or when to pound more.. it just seems so right now..
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.