The Chicago Cubs better than the NY Yankees? - Page 3

tuq · #21 07-16-2007, 12:31 AM

Gregatron,

Bob's cat is dead.

Thremp · #22 07-16-2007, 01:24 AM

Mikey,

How can you say the Angels are clearly better and the Yankees debatable when:

Yankees > Angels

Also apply to Indians as well and Mets who play in the Bush League.

Yankees have had very bad luck with injuries and still are one of the top teams in baseball.

kyleb · #23 07-16-2007, 01:54 AM

oh come on the Indians are like twice as good as the Cubs

vhawk01 · #24 07-16-2007, 05:24 AM

[ QUOTE ]
oh come on the Indians are like twice as good as the Cubs

[/ QUOTE ]

Line on 190 wins for the Indians this year?

kyleb · #25 07-16-2007, 05:32 AM

pshh, +190 if you're lucky

Sooga · #26 07-16-2007, 06:18 AM

[ QUOTE ]

Yankees > Angels

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh no you didn't, girlfriend

Cortz · #27 07-16-2007, 11:48 AM

i guess according to the OP the braves are better then the twins

vhawk01 · #28 07-16-2007, 03:44 PM

[ QUOTE ]
i guess according to the OP the braves are better then the twins

[/ QUOTE ]

Its probably really close.

Gregatron · #29 07-16-2007, 04:07 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Well, I suppose I should have clarified. The Chicago Cubs are one of the top 5 teams in baseball RIGHT NOW.

[/ QUOTE ]
This post made me giggle again.

DesertCat · #30 07-16-2007, 04:07 PM

[ QUOTE ]

Good stuff. Also noticed the D-Back numbers which confirms what I suspect just from the run differential. They are not that good and looking at the D1 etc they squeak by. Fun team to watch, though.

[/ QUOTE ]

I wish most DBack fans would understand this. Most think the team is actually good and only being held back by lousy managerial decisions, or bad management not trading our best prospects for some "veteran leadership".