Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Computer Technical Help
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-11-2007, 02:14 AM
Bishop22 Bishop22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Amphora Lounge
Posts: 1,369
Default Less restrictive firewall?

I've been trying to add a software firewall to my otherwise comprehensive security suite however I cannot find one that does not cut my internet bandwidth in half or worse. I've tried Comodo and Kerio which are supposed to be two of the best. When I run a bandwidth test with the Windows firewall on I get 3-5MB/sec but when I have the other firewalls on I get less than 1MB/sec. Is this just standard? Any settings that can be changed? Would buying Zonealarm that works with my router solve the problem?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-11-2007, 02:46 AM
jk1986 jk1986 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: London
Posts: 775
Default Re: Less restrictive firewall?

Give AVG a try (googleit)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-11-2007, 04:02 AM
bawcerelli bawcerelli is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 953
Default Re: Less restrictive firewall?

what do you mean zone alarm that works with your router? is there a zone alarm for routers? what brand of routers? wtf is going on? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-11-2007, 04:55 AM
Bishop22 Bishop22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Amphora Lounge
Posts: 1,369
Default Re: Less restrictive firewall?

It is a linksys router (wrt54g) there was an option during configuration to upgrade to zone alarm pro, I guess that wasn't relevant. I am pretty computer literate but I am clueless with firewalls.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-11-2007, 05:53 AM
bawcerelli bawcerelli is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 953
Default Re: Less restrictive firewall?

it seems to me that the network bandwidth isn't where the problem lies as far as performance goes. just seems like your pc is using plenty of cycles for the firewall, not your internet bandwidth getting cut down. but that's just how it seems from reading your post.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-11-2007, 01:59 PM
Beavis68 Beavis68 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,882
Default Re: Less restrictive firewall?

a firewall should not be trashing your bandwidth. it is probably some download virus scan that is doing that.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-11-2007, 07:17 PM
Bishop22 Bishop22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Amphora Lounge
Posts: 1,369
Default Re: Less restrictive firewall?

[ QUOTE ]
a firewall should not be trashing your bandwidth. it is probably some download virus scan that is doing that.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is it possible this is built into the Kerio Firewall?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-11-2007, 08:15 PM
udbrky udbrky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Having adventures 40 hrs/week
Posts: 1,008
Default Re: Less restrictive firewall?

Zone Alarm basic is very good. You can change settings and after you allow a program, it doesn't slow down your internet at all. And, it's free.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-11-2007, 09:08 PM
Bishop22 Bishop22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Amphora Lounge
Posts: 1,369
Default Re: Less restrictive firewall?

[ QUOTE ]
Zone Alarm basic is very good. You can change settings and after you allow a program, it doesn't slow down your internet at all. And, it's free.

[/ QUOTE ]

Cnet dropped ZA Basic from its recommeded list because it scored the lowest on the intrusion tests of all the free firewalls, I hear ZA Pro is good tho.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-11-2007, 10:08 PM
BiPolar_Nut BiPolar_Nut is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Slightly over the edge
Posts: 1,590
Default Re: Less restrictive firewall?

I run Comodo on one of my remote servers, and get 80%+ of the advertised 10Mbps upstream and downstream. Something else is affecting your bandwidth (FWIW, that server is very weak on processing....only a 3GHz Celeron but the server is optimized and only serves one low-processing use service)
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:59 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.