#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interested in a quick guestimate:
I think everyone's numbers are high. I'd say less then 50%.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interested in a quick guestimate:
i guarantee you guys like honeydonk, sunglasses, rebirth, clown of ages, and urabignubkthx are 2+2. they may not post, but i do think they read more than 'occasionally.'
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interested in a quick guestimate:
and also, im just talking about the regulars at party 3/6 game. i really have no clue above or below that.
and to be honest, there arent that many regulars at the limit anyway. like probably less than 50. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interested in a quick guestimate:
based on the number of people 3-bet/myself coach at MSNL, the number of people who post/read on 2p2 who are regulars in those games is definitely way more than you might expect
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interested in a quick guestimate:
during my brief run at 600NL I would sometimes sit at a table where everyone was on 2+2.
then I would get up. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interested in a quick guestimate:
[ QUOTE ]
im not saying regs at 3/6 are regs here. im saying, regs at 3/6 HAVE read at one point, or WILL read at one point 2+2. [/ QUOTE ] right yeah, sorry i should have been more specific. i was interested in % of regs at the tables that are also regs on the board. ohh and my guestimate would be in the 40-60% range. id be surprised if it were closer to 60 though. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: interested in a quick guestimate:
When I started out as a rec player, I watched the WSOP with Moneymaker and Raymer. I never 'knew' about 2+2 and it took me about a year to get pokertracker, then probabaly 3 years after playing online I visited 2+2. I'd think i'm pretty typical in this progression, but i have no way to know.
I have friends to play 5-10 hrs a week online and don't use PT or read 2+2. They still don't understand bb/100 or VPIP and I think that's pretty common. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|