mostly RIGGED networks - Cryptologic/Bossmedia

[futuredoc85]

[ QUOTE ]

people - stop posting idiotic remarks - i'am writing based from my exp.

or u think i work for pokerstars or ipoker? lol

9% after 1000 games is pretty good ROI, u know...

[/ QUOTE ]

not for $20 HU tourneys it isnt.

[rat bat blue]

9% over 20-100 - its top 2% players child

[futuredoc85]

[ QUOTE ]
9% over 20-100 - its top 2% players child

[/ QUOTE ]

if you're looking for somewhere to brag about your single digit ROI in tiny stakes HU SNGs may i suggest http://www.pocketfives.com

[rat bat blue]

my av. stake is $50 it is considered to be averange

[futuredoc85]

[ QUOTE ]
my av. stake is $50 it is considered to be averange

[/ QUOTE ]

oh ok. if you're looking for a place to brag about your single digit ROI in medium stakes HU donk and goes, might i suggest http://www.pocketfives.com

[rat bat blue]

i see no point is your suggestion - what this site can offer - a global per network leaderboard?

anyway, i check every player i play against with sharkscope and abs majority of them have worse ROI than mine.

[futuredoc85]

[ QUOTE ]
and you play 10/20?

[/ QUOTE ]

[rat bat blue]

so i consider u went busto with my last reply? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[futuredoc85]

[ QUOTE ]
i see no point is your suggestion - what this site can offer - a global per network leaderboard?

anyway, i check every player i play against with sharkscope and abs majority of them have worse ROI than mine.

[/ QUOTE ]

but you only have a 9% ROI on stars and only over 1k games, and you have more games at a much smaller ROI at other, softer sites.

[Warteen]

What you said was bugging me, so I went and did some research and it turns out you're right. Those sites are rigged...

Here's the proof.