|
|
#12
10-31-2007, 12:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Taj floor decision 2/5 nl
[ QUOTE ]
KITN for dealer for not running the game properly. Not sure about ruling though, where's RR when you need him [/ QUOTE ] I'll give ya 6:1 odds RR says "action offered and accepted" (or some variant). 
|
|
#13
10-31-2007, 01:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Taj floor decision 2/5 nl
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] KITN for dealer for not running the game properly. Not sure about ruling though, where's RR when you need him [/ QUOTE ] I'll give ya 6:1 odds RR says "action offered and accepted" (or some variant). [/ QUOTE ] I would love to accept the action because I'm a degenerate but I think that's the correct ruling.
|
|
#14
10-31-2007, 01:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Taj floor decision 2/5 nl
If the river hadn't already come out, and one of the involved players hadn't already tabled his hand, you can roll back. But you don't get to wait until the flush hits the river and the player tables his nut flush, and then say "haha, that wasn't a legal all-in so I get a do-over".
|
|
#15
10-31-2007, 01:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Taj floor decision 2/5 nl
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] KITN for dealer for not running the game properly. Not sure about ruling though, where's RR when you need him [/ QUOTE ] I'll give ya 6:1 odds RR says "action offered and accepted" (or some variant). [/ QUOTE ] I already said that. RR, just quote my post with a "QFT" and we'll call this matter closed. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#16
10-31-2007, 04:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Taj floor decision 2/5 nl
In a lot of places a raise is possible if the previous raise was >= 1/2 of the first raise. Here russian raises 63 to 198 which is >= (125/2 = 62.5), and hence a raise should be allowed under these rules. Most dealers I've encountered cannot add/divide properly. But again, some places don't follow this 1/2 rule.
|
|
#17
10-31-2007, 04:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Taj floor decision 2/5 nl
[ QUOTE ]
KITN for dealer for not running the game properly. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, 11 people at the table, nobody notices the problem until it's too late...but let's blame the dealer. Actually, we shouldn't even use the word "problem". Asian Lady wanted all her chips in, Stripper wanted all her chips in. What's the problem?
|
|
#18
10-31-2007, 05:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Taj floor decision 2/5 nl
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] KITN for dealer for not running the game properly. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, 11 people at the table, nobody notices the problem until it's too late...but let's blame the dealer. It litlerly took less than 3 seconds for the asian to go all in get called and have the dealer burn and turn the river. Actually, we shouldn't even use the word "problem". Asian Lady wanted all her chips in, Stripper wanted all her chips in. What's the problem? [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#19
10-31-2007, 05:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Taj floor decision 2/5 nl
I realize its more fun to think that the raise is $63 because it is just over half of $125 (which is also the wrong number to look at because you have to subtract the $2 big blind to get the net raise). But the raise was actually $73.
Carry on.
|
|
#20
10-31-2007, 05:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Taj floor decision 2/5 nl
[ QUOTE ]
I realize its more fun to think that the raise is $63 because it is just over half of $125 (which is also the wrong number to look at because you have to subtract the $2 big blind to get the net raise). But the raise was actually $73. Carry on. [/ QUOTE ] Big blind is 5 not 2 not sure how thats relevant. But you are right i do retard math in the morning.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
