|
|
#1
08-17-2006, 06:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Bush vs the Constitution.
Warrantless wiretaps are unconstitutional according to Mi Judge.
Forbes Source 
|
|
#3
08-17-2006, 06:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bush is the dog
Can lay you 3:2.
For the distance. Mickey Brausch
|
|
#4
08-17-2006, 06:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bush vs the Constitution.
It doesn't matter what the judge says. Bush has already stated that the constitution doesn't apply to him. So far no one has challenged him.
|
|
#5
08-17-2006, 06:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bush vs the Constitution.
Gen. Franks doubts the Constitution will survive a WMD attack
What happens in Bush thumbs his nose at the Court? Are we really that close to martial law?
|
|
#6
08-17-2006, 08:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bush vs the Constitution.
[ QUOTE ]
It doesn't matter what the judge says. Bush has already stated that the constitution doesn't apply to him. So far no one has challenged him. [/ QUOTE ] Right on the money
|
|
#7
08-17-2006, 08:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
A popular radio personality had this to say.....
|
|
#8
08-17-2006, 08:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A popular radio personality had this to say.....
I really put alot of weight in what Rush Limbaugh has to say about anything. Please link an Ann Coulter article as well, as she is always clearheaded and civil.
|
|
#9
08-17-2006, 08:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: A popular radio personality had this to say.....
My pleasure:
It's a bit too early for comment on the ruling, but this article is about something related...
|
|
#10
08-17-2006, 10:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bush vs the Constitution.
This is a pretty unpersuasive opinion. It spends most of its time vaguely developing fourth amendment arguments and much less time considering how the surveillance program relates to FISA. I predict reversal in this opinion's future.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
