|
|
|
|
#2
11-21-2007, 07:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: three of a kind, not bad: Fill In the Blanks
fwiw: I couldn't fold to a c/r in a pot this big but I would NEVER 3-bet unless the lag is a total moron
|
|
#3
11-21-2007, 07:17 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: three of a kind, not bad: Fill In the Blanks
[ QUOTE ]
fwiw: I couldn't fold to a c/r in a pot this big but I would NEVER 3-bet unless the lag is a total moron [/ QUOTE ] what can lag have on the river that beats us? it's really unlikely he has a straight or a set based on the action in previous streets so if he does c/r it's most likely a hand like JT/J9.
|
|
#4
11-21-2007, 08:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: three of a kind, not bad: Fill In the Blanks
no, it is very likely for him to have the straight given the previous action, maybe even with a spade draw, which would make quite a few combos possible
the lag would def 3-bet the turn with top set and I'm pretty sure 3 would go in with middle set as well jacks for the lag seems unlikely given his preflop cc, which makes a rivered set unlikely as well only 3 type of hands make sense: - a rivered top two with JT (J9 seems quite unlikely to me given the flop action) but in my experience most players lead out with such a hand on the river instead of c/r'ing - a rivered straight, possibly in combination with a spade draw, which makes up for a lot of combos - a total bluff after a missed draw, which would be completely retarded against a player like PJ add the slight possibility of a higher set and value 3-betting a cr is suicide +++EDIT+++ and I didn't even mention the obvious fact that river cr's are way more often a strong hand than a bluff
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
