Which Groups *DO NOT* Deserve a Seat on the PPA Board?

[BluffTHIS!]

I have discussed many times the composition of the PPA board and why I feel it is in drastic need of being revamped in order to give it a broad range of relevant and competent expertise that it needs to have the best chance of success in general, and also to be assured of pursuing all of the broader range of goals that most rank and file members have, as opposed to primarily focusing on benefiting the business models of specific concerns.

The poll I am including here is an attempt to see which of those industry concerns *are least deserving or undeserving* of representation on the PPA board. I have enabled the ability to vote for two choices. Also if you please, you can post and give your reasons for your votes. It would especially be enlightening if such reasoning included what a specific industry groups brings to the table that helps the cause of poker, and what it brings that harms the cause of poker. Or rather, is a specific concern benefiting the PPA and the goals that its members have in some way, or is it only interested in its own self-interest (specific business models again).