|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl JJ oop
id bet more on the flop, and id fold the river
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl JJ oop
I'd fold the river too with no history.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl JJ oop
yeah seems like a really standard fold on the river. the only things that i see betting the river with any large frequency that we are ahead of is pure floats, and without a great read on the villain, i dont think we can ever call profitably here.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl JJ oop
Imo most of the time he calls the flop when ahead, raises when behind.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl JJ oop
[ QUOTE ]
Imo most of the time he calls the flop when ahead, raises when behind. [/ QUOTE ] agree, im also leading the river for this reason |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl JJ oop
[ QUOTE ]
Imo most of the time he calls the flop when ahead, raises when behind. [/ QUOTE ] Good point. A flop call seems like monster or a medium strength hand that he suspects is WA/WB. Something like AK, KQs, JJ+, right? I guess I was thinking at the time that 88-TT were also very likely and dismissed AK because he didnt 4-bet pre or raise the flop. He also wouldnt turn these medium strength hands into bluffs, since they have lots of showdown value. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 400nl JJ oop
so we bet the flop to get raised? I don't get it.
|
|
|