|
|
#24
06-27-2007, 11:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Deep stacked 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
don't see how Jfish's comment was at all smug... [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, Jfish is one of the consistently better posters here who always seems nice. I highly doubt he was being intentionally smug to another well respected poster. 
|
|
#25
06-28-2007, 12:10 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Deep stacked 5/10
jeeez people think that being deep is a great excuse to play like a pansy.
Why can't he be pushing a flush or straight? Why do we automatically put him on a boat when he's played exactly like a flush or straight draw? I need a read to fold here, I don't have one...
|
|
#27
06-28-2007, 12:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Deep stacked 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
jeeez people think that being deep is a great excuse to play like a pansy. Why can't he be pushing a flush or straight? Why do we automatically put him on a boat when he's played exactly like a flush or straight draw? I need a read to fold here, I don't have one... [/ QUOTE ] pretty much this is how I feel about these spots. But most people don't think like this, and are too weak-tight to valueshove smaller flushes or try to take us off of AK/AA or w/e. ALso, I agree with whoever said that a pot-sized bet is better here.
|
|
#28
06-28-2007, 12:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Deep stacked 5/10
If you're playing LAG I would expect him to raise a draw somewhere to try to take you off your "bluff". Solid TAGs tend not to flatcall 2 streets with draws on paired boards.
I think this is a fold.
|
|
#30
06-28-2007, 03:14 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Deep stacked 5/10
I think the small turn bet makes it more likely he calls there with a FD. This is also a perfect river to push, because you are likely folding 100% of your range unless you have a boat this deep
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
