NL Bots on Full Tilt

[MyTurn2Raise]

does Brandon Joe wear #47?

[Wahoo73]

[ QUOTE ]
You are missing the point. Even if they didn't beat NL200, bots are illegal and threaten the integrity of the game.

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP.

[BGnight]

[ QUOTE ]
http://www.pocketfives.com/C18A38DB-...3D40D4C9B.aspx



interesting

[/ QUOTE ]

wow, he's from PA. Am I missing something else?

[raistlinx]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
FWIW, I did an IP search on BrandonJoseph's account and only found that it was in the U.S.

Then I did a "tracert" and while it eventually timed out, the last hop was in Pittsburgh.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well that pretty much confirms that he WAS indeed that bot owner. Nice work, dlk9s.

[/ QUOTE ]
He can't do this.

[BGnight]

[ QUOTE ]
does Brandon Joe wear #47?

[/ QUOTE ]

he wore 38 in college. Couldn't find any of his pro #'s

[ComplacentMarmot]

http://forum.pokercollectif.com/arch...hp/t-1766.html

http://www.pokerhand.org/?868309

http://www.bigstack.com/player/playe...0_Drunkenboxer

[johnnycakes]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
http://www.pocketfives.com/C18A38DB-...3D40D4C9B.aspx



interesting

[/ QUOTE ]

wow, he's from PA. Am I missing something else?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes

[ QUOTE ]
Sites this user plays on
Bodog coin flip [Verified]
FullTiltPoker full_tilting [Verified]
ParadisePoker chuckk [Verified]
PartyPoker bigfooot74 [Verified]
PokerRoom xdeal_me_inx [Verified]
PokerShare a_donation [Verified]
PokerStars chuckk [Verified]
SunPoker donationn [Verified]
UltimateBet audiodealer [Verified]

[/ QUOTE ]

[me999so]

[ QUOTE ]
Quote:
You are missing the point. Even if they didn't beat NL200, bots are illegal and threaten the integrity of the game.


FYP.

[/ QUOTE ]
I thought the obvious didn't need to be mentioned, but thanks for the addition! I'm surely still more worried about the money.

[xGREGORx]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You are missing the point. Even if they didn't beat NL200, bots are illegal and threaten the integrity of the game.

[/ QUOTE ]



that's what bothers me the most... we should still be able to exploit a bot's tendencies, but recreational fishy players will leave our game if they feel this is a problem

[MyTurn2Raise]

[ QUOTE ]
I mostly ignored bot issues because I agreed with the popular sentiment at the time that it was just too complicated to program a bot to play well at an kind of meaningful stakes.

I wonder why this would be compared with ALL the calculations a chess-bot can perform or even how half-decently I assume some of the players are on Turbo-Holdem or one of the WSOP video-game things (where you play against Ferguson or Hachem or whoever).

But people around here convinced me otherwise that it just wasn't realistic at that time for a bot to do well.


Then I saw evidence to the contrary in various threads and used my incredible skills of reasoning and open-mindedness to look at the situation anew.


It's not that tough to have PREVIOUSLY thought bots weren't very realistic and then to open your eyes and realize you might have been wrong.

[/ QUOTE ]

i'm in agreement with microbob

with the $22 SNG bots on party
with the midstakes 6 max limit bots on party
now this

tough to not think bots are playing a significant role in the online community