Messing around in 1/2 - I think I only have one choice here.

[frenchfish]

U showed strentgh all the way on that hand and u had no prior history with that particular player before that hand so i m not sure we can assign more than 10% bluff into vilain s range.If that s the case a range of a player that looks "solidish" as u crushed in that spot.

[ArturiusX]

We're basing our decisions around not enough info. I maybe have two orbits on the guy.

[Melchiades]

[ QUOTE ]
Are we sure?

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes.

[Jay Riall]

And your standard line should be to fold this turn without better reads imo...

[Nick Royale]

[ QUOTE ]
We're basing our decisions around not enough info. I maybe have two orbits on the guy.

[/ QUOTE ]
Still, what worse hand can we put him on? His line suggests great strength and not many players turn a PP into a bluff here. I guess something like AQhh or AJhh is possible. I wouldn't be suprised if he c/c flop with any AQ/AJ, but people at this level so rarely bluff in this spot. Even without a good read this is 8x/88/33/TT too often to continue.

[Melchiades]

[ QUOTE ]
And your standard line should be to fold this turn without better reads imo...

[/ QUOTE ]
For sure. Standard unknown is 100x more likely to make a move on the flop than turn on this kind of board.

[Chicago Twister]

um, i think you should call. because the board is paired on the flop, its much less likely that he was baluga'ing with something like a flopped set. this could be a bluff with nothing or even with a small pair. i'd call here & reevaluate the river action.

[Nielsio]

Looks like his pp is not holding up to your boldness and aggressiveness. OTOH he might be a drewler who is OWNING YOU WITH HIS MAGNIFICANT SLOWPLAYING. On this end we usually hold back on this boldness and aggresiveness.

[Jay Riall]

Villains play looks fine if he has a monster....

[Noam Chomsky]

[ QUOTE ]
Villains play looks fine if he has a monster....

[/ QUOTE ]

How can this be when everyone is saying fold?