Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Poker > Stud
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-24-2007, 03:19 AM
Red_Diamond Red_Diamond is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 567
Default Stud-7 (How bad a play is this?)

8 seated ring. Player behind the Bring-In has a Queen showing and limps. I have split kings and decide to raise in middle position. Action comes around to the door-card queen player again, who re-raises ?

The first thought that went through my mind is he very probably limped with rolled up queens. However since all my Kings were live and I was not 100% sure, I called to see what would happen next. 4'th street paird the player's Queen door card and hence we all folded to him.

At this point the player showed his hand, which had burried aces before he mucked.

I'm still debating on this one. Limping with burried aces first to act at a rull ring? Is this a tactic many here think sound? I admit I'm not an EXPERT Stud player, but it seems flawed to me by giving numerous others cheaper odds to come in and break you. Again, this was using a limit structure, not Pot-Limit, so it seems more flawed to me the more I look at it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-24-2007, 04:08 AM
electrical electrical is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: chicago
Posts: 650
Default Re: Stud-7 (How bad a play is this?)

There are very few games I've been in where this would be a good idea. Doing it UTG is only a good idea if you are certain there will be a raise back to you so you can face opponents with two cold and shorten the field. If opponents won't fold to the raise, or if opponents won't raise into you from the end, then a limp has no utility.

Never say "never," and all that, but this seems like a bad idea almost always.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-24-2007, 08:34 AM
Ray Zee Ray Zee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: montana usa
Posts: 4,803
Default Re: Stud-7 (How bad a play is this?)

its a perfectly fine play especially if the game is very tight or very loose. tight and you may just get the antees. loose and you get action anyway and get more read on the hands.
if you raise alot with three flushes and three straights then you need to raise here. but most players only raise with their big pairs and give away their hands worrying that someone might get in too cheap.
that he showed -showed he isnt very astute.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-24-2007, 10:21 AM
SCSTWG SCSTWG is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 64
Default Re: Stud-7 (How bad a play is this?)

Good point about showing his cards - obviously no upside to that.

If I had A-A-Q and was first to act with a K or A behind me, I would raise and hope that they reraise putting me on Q's. From here, this are several ways to play the hand out.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-24-2007, 10:30 AM
Brad1970 Brad1970 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Posts: 1,815
Default Re: Stud-7 (How bad a play is this?)

At the lower limit stud games (5/10 & below), you see players do this quite often & some doing it everytime they get a pair of J's or higher. Then, of course, they can't help themselves but to show you the buried big pair. IMO, really bad unless someone else behind you will raise it again.

Someone else mentioned using this play to force opponents to fold or call 2 bets cold. I don't think it works all that well in low limit stud because they aren't gonna fold anyway...at least not anything that resembles a good hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:37 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.