|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Which is better? | |||
| (12) Dr. No |
   
|
60 | 58.25% |
| (13) The Man with the Golden Gun |
  
|
43 | 41.75% |
| Voters: 103. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#22
10-17-2007, 06:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Does professional poker contribute to society?
[ QUOTE ]
theres no argument agaisnt it because theyre right. so? ty for your money dumbasses now i go snort coke from a bunch of silicontits, have fun at your job sucker. [/ QUOTE ] LOL 
|
|
#23
10-17-2007, 06:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Being told \"professional poker doesn\'t contribute to society.\"
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Professionals entertain recreational players so i consider them entertainers like actors ball players etc. [/ QUOTE ] What about Andy Beal? [/ QUOTE ] What about him?? [/ QUOTE ] Wanted to quote another post and got this one instead of it. I edited it now. [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
|
|
#24
10-17-2007, 06:56 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Being told \"professional poker doesn\'t contribute to society.\"
It is true, Pro Poker does not contribute to the society.
Only a poker player makes himself believe that it does. Barry Greenstein is a good example. It is like Pablo Escobar donating millions to charity, to offset the damages.
|
|
#25
10-17-2007, 06:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Does professional poker contribute to society?
[ QUOTE ]
Good point. [/ QUOTE ] not really. redistributing wealth from individuals to the government doesn't qualify as contributing imo. the point that plenty of other occupations don't contribute is valid, but that doesn't make being a poker player any "better" imo.
|
|
#26
10-17-2007, 07:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Being told \"professional poker doesn\'t contribute to society.\"
I win most of my money from foreigners. Therefore I create wealth in my own country. If some Frenchman donks off a stack to me and I go spend it then at least 'my society' is better off.
|
|
#27
10-17-2007, 07:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Does professional poker contribute to society?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Good point. [/ QUOTE ] not really. redistributing wealth from individuals to the government doesn't qualify as contributing imo. the point that plenty of other occupations don't contribute is valid, but that doesn't make being a poker player any "better" imo. [/ QUOTE ] It is contributing to society... just in a less efficient manner.
|
|
#28
10-17-2007, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Being told \"professional poker doesn\'t contribute to society.\"
[ QUOTE ]
Unless it is televised, poker is just an isolated event inside some room. Nobody not at that table benefit from the game taking place. Televised poker could be considered entertainment, in the same way as football games, and has a purpose in society. The society needs leaders (e.g. The President). The society needs lawyers. The society needs doctors. The society needs bank clerks. I have problems finding any profession that is comparable to poker players in terms of society uselessness. Edit: Taxes do contribute to society. I'm looking past that right now. [/ QUOTE ] QFT
|
|
#29
10-17-2007, 07:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Does professional poker contribute to society?
You can argue redistributing the wealth does.
Fish can either: 1) Lose money to other fish 2) Lose money to pros that withdraw 3) Lose money to rake There is only 1 option where they can lose money where the money goes back to the government.
|
|
#30
10-17-2007, 07:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Does professional poker contribute to society?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Good point. [/ QUOTE ] not really. redistributing wealth from individuals to the government doesn't qualify as contributing imo. the point that plenty of other occupations don't contribute is valid, but that doesn't make being a poker player any "better" imo. [/ QUOTE ] It is contributing to society... just in a less efficient manner. [/ QUOTE ] explain?
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
