Gigabet and a 75% ROI in the $10+1's

[david050173]

[ QUOTE ]
All this talk about 75% ROI and table selection is weak.



[/ QUOTE ]

OK ROI but your ITM is a bit low. Should also be 75% [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[Newt_Buggs]

didn't read anything but Zee's original post and came up with the following profound though:

Does it matter?

[PartyRocks!]

bump

[BusterAMG]

The 75-25 on Crypto is what allows 50% to be achieved, because very few players even at 200's know how to play optimal heads-up. Plus, there are many times when 1 donk will take out the other four by Level 2 15/30, and you can obliterate him despite the 5 to 1 chip disadvantage.

6max is much more high maintenance and tougher to multitable, but weaknesses in opponents are much easier to expose and hammer, thus allowing for sick ROIs.

[Slo Pok]

IMO it appears that PrayingMantis and Gigabet have two different models (player characteristics) of the player in the $11 SG's. Do either of you give the "amount at risk" any value when defining the player model?
Thanks, it's a very educational topic.

[microbet]

[ QUOTE ]
bump

[/ QUOTE ]WTF?!?!?! I've never ever supported a banning, but bumping this thread.......

[ActionFreak]

[ QUOTE ]
If a huge portion of the extra money is game selection, I really don't think it's very interesting wether it's possible or not. Since spending lots of time scouting games at the 11's would seem like a pretty costly decision if it means not being able to constantly multitable.

[/ QUOTE ]

It is not extremely interesting whether it is possible or not anyway.... anyone that can do that well at the 11s could be making way more at higher levels so the max ROI doesn't matter

[AggieYank]

Anyone who thinks that a 75% ROI is possible at the 11s on party poker is either 1) stupid, 2) has been playing upper levels for too long, and forgot how the 11s actually play.

It depends on so many factors, but a 40-45% ROI is possibly sustainable for a great great player at the 11s. If ZeeJustin were to try this, I'd bet on him having around a 35-40% ROI.

Posts like that piss me off in both their arrogance and stupidity.

[suzzer99]

[ QUOTE ]
Posts like that piss me off in both their arrogance and stupidity.

[/ QUOTE ]

And no I'm not seconding you. I'm replying to you. Read the whole thread and Gig's stuff in the first 'official crap' thread. Read Gig's stereotyping stuff and ZJ's thoughts in this thread. Read what Lori had to say. It may very well be impossible. But try to come up with something a little more orginal than just calling ZJ and GB idiots.

[curtains]

[ QUOTE ]
The 75-25 on Crypto is what allows 50% to be achieved, because very few players even at 200's know how to play optimal heads-up. Plus, there are many times when 1 donk will take out the other four by Level 2 15/30, and you can obliterate him despite the 5 to 1 chip disadvantage.

6max is much more high maintenance and tougher to multitable, but weaknesses in opponents are much easier to expose and hammer, thus allowing for sick ROIs.

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude this is total BS, you cant obliterate anyone with a 5-1 chip disadvantage