Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Medium Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 11-13-2007, 02:35 PM
nineinchal nineinchal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,285
Default Re: A hand against Swami...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I never understand why people slow down on the flop and then lead the turn.

[/ QUOTE ]

to induce people to overplay TPTK and overpairs.

[/ QUOTE ]

Since he is drunk. He can blow a 3.0 after the case of beer he consumed.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-13-2007, 02:36 PM
cgrohman cgrohman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,754
Default Re: A hand against Swami...

Why not either a) raise the flop again and lead the turn or b) c/r the turn? I think calling and leading makes little sense.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-13-2007, 02:40 PM
nineinchal nineinchal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,285
Default Re: A hand against Swami...

[ QUOTE ]
Why not either a) raise the flop again and lead the turn or b) c/r the turn? I think calling and leading makes little sense.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because if he has an ace, he may raise the my turn lead. Especially if he has a king or queen kicker or aces up.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-13-2007, 02:48 PM
JJH3984 JJH3984 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,876
Default Re: A hand against Swami...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why not either a) raise the flop again and lead the turn or b) c/r the turn? I think calling and leading makes little sense.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because if he has an ace, he may raise the my turn lead. Especially if he has a king or queen kicker or aces up.

[/ QUOTE ]

If this is the case, won't he put in more action on the flop? Why don't you just threebet then c/r or b/3b when he fourbets?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-13-2007, 03:20 PM
nineinchal nineinchal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,285
Default Re: A hand against Swami...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why not either a) raise the flop again and lead the turn or b) c/r the turn? I think calling and leading makes little sense.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because if he has an ace, he may raise the my turn lead. Especially if he has a king or queen kicker or aces up.

[/ QUOTE ]

If this is the case, won't he put in more action on the flop? Why don't you just threebet then c/r or b/3b when he fourbets?

[/ QUOTE ]

My read is that he may put in more action on the flop, but maybe not, since the Swami is very deceptive.

However, I have seen him cap the flop, and then take a freebie on the turn, so I ain't letting him do that, especially if he had AK, he would most likely raise my turn bet, with the deuce turn card.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 11-13-2007, 03:21 PM
3rdCheckRaise 3rdCheckRaise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sit 10
Posts: 769
Default Re: A hand against Swami...

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why not either a) raise the flop again and lead the turn or b) c/r the turn? I think calling and leading makes little sense.

[/ QUOTE ]

Because if he has an ace, he may raise the my turn lead. Especially if he has a king or queen kicker or aces up.

[/ QUOTE ]
...or if you 3 bet the flop he may cap it thinking that you on the FD and raise you on the turn anyway. Openlimping on MP with 44 is pretty terrible, you did and got lucky, great! Now gas it and give your opponenet a chance to make as many mistakes as possible. This whole post seems to be one majot brag about how you outplayed drunk Swami and i hope that was a highlight of your session.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-13-2007, 03:22 PM
nineinchal nineinchal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,285
Default Re: A hand against Swami...

[quote This whole post seems to be one majot brag about how you outplayed drunk Swami and i hope that was a highlight of your session.

[/ QUOTE ]

Who says I outplayed him even though it sounds like I outplayed him?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-13-2007, 03:24 PM
KitCloudkicker KitCloudkicker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Nittiest LAG Ever
Posts: 2,366
Default Re: A hand against Swami...

a little off topic, but i think its kinda funny how when he's drunk he can be pretty tricky and good lagtag and when he's sober he's a completely predictable fit or fold TAG.

drunk swami = -EV! (for the table)
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-13-2007, 03:25 PM
3rdCheckRaise 3rdCheckRaise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: sit 10
Posts: 769
Default Re: A hand against Swami...

[ QUOTE ]
[quote This whole post seems to be one majot brag about how you outplayed drunk Swami and i hope that was a highlight of your session.

[/ QUOTE ]

Who says I outplayed him even though it sounds like I outplayed him?

[/ QUOTE ]

No...it sounds like you outcard him and in the proccess outplayed yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-13-2007, 03:29 PM
nineinchal nineinchal is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 1,285
Default Re: A hand against Swami...

[ QUOTE ]
a little off topic, but i think its kinda funny how when he's drunk he can be pretty tricky and good lagtag and when he's sober he's a completely predictable fit or fold TAG.

drunk swami = -EV!

[/ QUOTE ]

True, I was playing next table over from Swami this past Saturday, and he was drinking water. His stack was down to the felt.

That is very funny!!!

I'll tell him to suck down more Beck's as a helpful poker coach.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.