Ethicality of High Stakes HU - DaEvila

[FTheFish]

This chat is just happened when FoxwoodsFiend was waiting at a table and gopheresque sat down. Does no one have a problem with this?

DaEvils: you want a piece?
gopheresque: sup
DaEvils: it'll be me, krantz, and whitlelime talking
together
DaEvils: playing him
gopheresque: im a wuss when it comes to thta stuff
gopheresque: hmm
DaEvils: np
DaEvils: gl @ the tables
gopheresque: lemme think
sikersorozat (Observer): gl evils
DaEvils: cool
DaEvils: later
gopheresque: i thikn
gopheresque: it is def a good bet
gopheresque: dunno if i'd do it though still
DaEvils: np, let me know
DaEvils: later


Splitting action is fine, but playing 3 on 1 is pretty unfair and morally very questionable. I thought Ariel prided himself on being ethical and holding high morals?

[Enervate]

STFU Noob

[ryanaw]

nothing wrong with splitting action as DaEvils prob has'nt got the roll to be playing 2 HU tables of 300/600 and maybe doesnt want to be risking alot of money playing a complete donk.

[Poseidon65]

And if Ivey and Antonius want to come over and help out as well, I don't see a problem with it.

[SuperSnort]

[ QUOTE ]
And if Ivey and Antonius want to come over and help out as well, I don't see a problem with it.

[/ QUOTE ]
why would antonius come over? he pwns all by himself

[Rob121]

[ QUOTE ]
And if Ivey and Antonius want to come over and help out as well, I don't see a problem with it.

[/ QUOTE ]

[steel108]

I have no problem with splitting action; these stakes are getting sick and it's actually the smart thing to do. My only problem with this whole thing is the simple fact that people who are supposed to be good are teaming up vs donks. It's a joke. If I ever played that high and I found out that the person I was playing was teaming up, I would probably stalk them and beat them within an inch of their life (especailly with the amount of money involved). Did Whitelime and Krantz team up when they both went on that super rush a couple of months ago? Did CTS team up too? If I was perkysmerky, I would be looking for the best bat that Dick's Sporting Goods carrys.

[MasterLJ]

I think 3 great players, all of varying styles, would actually add more confusion than help in a game with a very finite amount of time to make decisions.

However, if they switched off playing (one for 10 hands, then the other, then the other) that would an absolute nightmare.

[felixleong]

3 people trying to come out with 1 decision
wouldnt that end up with arguements and confusion?

[Stinger88]

I don't personally do this but it's not against the rules, part of online poker