#1
|
|||
|
|||
$100NL - TT vs 2 unkowns and overcard
No reads on villain. Too passive again?
Poker Stars No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $0.50/$1 6 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $148.70 UTG+1: $99.30 CO: $131.10 Button: $96.50 Hero: $96.40 BB: $148.85 Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is SB with T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#cc0000">UTG raises to $4</font>, 3 folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $13</font>, BB calls, UTG calls. Flop: 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 2[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] ($39, 3 players) Hero checks, <font color="#cc0000">BB bets $15</font>, UTG folds, Hero folds. Uncalled bets: $15 returned to BB. Results: Final pot: $39 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100NL - TT vs 2 unkowns and overcard
I bet $27 on flop.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100NL - TT vs 2 unkowns and overcard
this is ugly. if you lead pf, youll have to fire a cbet on this flop, tho if utg is resonable, you may only want to call this for setvalue. bet 29-32 on this flop.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100NL - TT vs 2 unkowns and overcard
I would probably bet this flop.
As played, folding isn't terrible, as you are OOP and have no idea where you are. But if you are going to play this passive, I might be inclined to just call preflop and try to hit a set. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100NL - TT vs 2 unkowns and overcard
[ QUOTE ]
this is ugly. if you lead pf, youll have to fire a cbet on this flop, tho if utg is resonable, you may only want to call this for setvalue. bet 29-32 on this flop. [/ QUOTE ] I wanted to isolate UTG; when that would have happened, I always cbet almost every flop. But I usually don't cbet into 2 unknowns OOP, that's why I just checked. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $100NL - TT vs 2 unkowns and overcard
its not like you dont have anything, as flops go that's a good one for you, your bet will have alot of value
|
|
|