![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
He was five percent to win. He was five percent to win.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
rafe furst is horrid
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
the best part about poker vids on youtube is the user comments underneath...
'Of course it's justice... Thats what you SHOULD get when you play the worst hand in poker... Against aces no less... You certainly couldn't call it a bad-beat, could you?' |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
LOL at anyone that can't understand exactly why each player acted the way they did on each action taken. Especially funny is anyone that thinks Rafe should have opened for a decent sized raise.
Poker is a game of situations and each player acted very sensibly in the situation they were in all the way through. The only mistake would be if they somehow knew their opponents cards, but of course they didn't. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
why did norman chad say you want to win the pot preflop with aces? wtf, rusrs?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
why did norman chad say you want to win the pot preflop with aces? wtf, rusrs? [/ QUOTE ] Because 72os > AA post-flop. DUCY? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For once 72os should have have won...
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
nothing beats youtube comments
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
nothing beats youtube comments [/ QUOTE ] Youtube arguments in the comments beats just the comments. |
![]() |
|
|