Perfect-perfect live

[Analyst]

$40/80 live game

Hero raises ATs in MP, folded to loose, short-stacked player in SB; he has about 2-2.5BB in front of him and calls.

Flop is AAJ. Hero bets, SB calls but looks ready to muck.

Turn is J. SB checks, hero bets, SB is about to muck but looks at the board again and tosses in his last half a bet.

River is J. SB has KJ and takes down a pot he was ~0.1% to win on the flop.

Brag: The chips came back to me an orbit later.
Beat: Perfect-perfect? C'mon . . .
Variance: It only cost me a couple of BB.

[Party]

only the river was perfect

ducy

[Nielsio]

[ QUOTE ]
only the river was perfect

ducy

[/ QUOTE ]

[dallas14]

[ QUOTE ]
only the river was perfect

ducy

[/ QUOTE ]

ICY

[centaurmyth]

[ QUOTE ]
only the river was perfect

ducy

[/ QUOTE ]

Seeing why kills the whole concept of perfect-perfect?

[Analyst]

[ QUOTE ]
only the river was perfect

ducy

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, I understand that he could have gotten either jack on the turn but don't be a nit. When you have to hit two exact cards on the turn and river, it's called "perfect-perfect".

[Fabian]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
only the river was perfect

ducy

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, I understand that he could have gotten either jack on the turn but don't be a nit. When you have to hit two exact cards on the turn and river, it's called "perfect-perfect".

[/ QUOTE ]

..And this wasn't "two exact cards"?

[TheLemonShark]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
only the river was perfect

ducy

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, I understand that he could have gotten either jack on the turn but don't be a nit. When you have to hit two exact cards on the turn and river, it's called "perfect-perfect".

[/ QUOTE ]
UDon'tCY

[Tigerpiper]

The first jack was perfect because Hero knew it gave villain under trips, then the next jack was perfect because it gave hero under trips.

[isapistola]

i dont see why.

if villain makes any full house OP will win with aces full? the only other way to win besides quads would be a running royal flush.