PokerFink's 2007 NFC Rankings (Week 3)

[MyTurn2Raise]

[ QUOTE ]
ROFL @ Tampa that high.

Especially rofl now that Cadillac's knee went out of phase with the rest of his body yesterday.

AZ is way too high as well. They're one Shaun Alexander not being a retard away from one more loss on their record.

[/ QUOTE ]

they're also really close to being 4-0
guy fails to cover a fumble v SF
two-minute drive by Balt

[ProfessorBen]

[ QUOTE ]
ROFL @ Tampa that high.


[/ QUOTE ]

ROFL @ mod that doesn't read OP before responding.

[niss]

Funny how the Giants have gone from "likely 0-16" to "the only team to hang with Dallas" (heard this on the radio this morning).

[Triumph36]

[ QUOTE ]
Funny how the Giants have gone from "likely 0-16" to "the only team to hang with Dallas" (heard this on the radio this morning).

[/ QUOTE ]

sweet juicy Justice.

[Jack of Arcades]

It's not like Cadillac has been good this year, anyway.

Tampa has an effective 2 game lead in the division already, and there's nobody that can challenge them really. Seattle is up on Zona but they've lost to them already, and Zona is probably better than any NFC South team.

After the top 2 it's really just a big jumble, though. Everyone's beaten everyone else (except New Orleans and St. Louis) so you can't use beatpaths to figure anything out. IE:

Arizona > Seattle > San Fran > Arizona

I guess you could argue for New York being #5. Arizona looks good at 6 but so does Detroit. I'm not sure anyone outside of those 3 and Washington can make the playoffs...

[xorbie]

1. Dallas
2. GB
3. Seattle
4. Tampa
5. Zona
6. Washington
7. Detroit/NYG/Chicago

[daaaaahawkz]

[ QUOTE ]
It's not like Cadillac has been good this year, anyway.

Tampa has an effective 2 game lead in the division already, and there's nobody that can challenge them really. Seattle is up on Zona but they've lost to them already, and Zona is probably better than any NFC South team.

After the top 2 it's really just a big jumble, though. Everyone's beaten everyone else (except New Orleans and St. Louis) so you can't use beatpaths to figure anything out. IE:

Arizona > Seattle > San Fran > Arizona

I guess you could argue for New York being #5. Arizona looks good at 6 but so does Detroit. I'm not sure anyone outside of those 3 and Washington can make the playoffs...

[/ QUOTE ]

cmaaan give the seahawks some credit they are way better than arizona. the cardinals had so many things go right for them that game like shaun fumbling the game away with 2 mins left.

i think the hawks actually have a decent argument for #2 in the nfc considering the packers are prolly gunna come back down to earth eventually

[Franchise 60]

[ QUOTE ]
1. Dallas
2. GB
3. Seattle
4. Tampa
5. Zona
6. Washington
7. Detroit/NYG/Chicago

[/ QUOTE ]

Didn't NY beat Washington on the road? I don't think Washington has done anything super impressive enough to warrant them being ranked higher than the Giants when they lost to the Giants at home. Just my 2 Cents.

[xorbie]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
1. Dallas
2. GB
3. Seattle
4. Tampa
5. Zona
6. Washington
7. Detroit/NYG/Chicago

[/ QUOTE ]

Didn't NY beat Washington on the road? I don't think Washington has done anything super impressive enough to warrant them being ranked higher than the Giants when they lost to the Giants at home. Just my 2 Cents.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think consistency may be more important than talent in this NFC. It's close either way.

[Franchise 60]

1. Dallas
2. GB
3. Seattle
4. TB
5. AZ
6. Giants
7. Lions
8. Washington
9. Chicago
10. Philly
11. Carolina
12. SF
13. Minny
14. NO
15. Atlanta
16. St. Louis

5-8 are pretty much interchangeable.