|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100: Butchered a hand. Am I a moron for considering this call?
[ QUOTE ]
The only time you would want to lead this weak on the river, imo, is when you are trying to induce a push/big raise. If calling a push/big raise is something you don't want to do, then a check is much better here I think. I think you need to be checking or at least making a real bet here to make your decision easier. [/ QUOTE ] As soon as I made the bet, I thought it should have been bigger so as not to induce a bluff and therefore a raise would be an easy fold. c/c a reasonable bet is also much better than the line I took. But once at this spot, what are the chances I have induced a bluff? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100: Butchered a hand. Am I a moron for considering this call?
c/c the river is a lot better than b/f. every draw missed and a lot of his made hand range that he is calling with is beating you now anyway. And obv bet sizing wasn't good.
Edit: I probably fold the river unless you know hes really aggro. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100: Butchered a hand. Am I a moron for considering this call?
Bet the turn bigger imo.
c/c river is better than b/f and c/f is to weak I think vs this opponent. He's range does include J's but also missed flush draws that could draw at a cheap prices wich he will be bluffing with on the river. so c/c imo |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: NL 100: Butchered a hand. Am I a moron for considering this call?
[ QUOTE ]
what are the chances I have induced a bluff? [/ QUOTE ] This is kind of the point. There is no way for you to know this. So you have kind of put yourself in a bad spot - which you want to avoid by not making these kinds of bets. |
|
|