|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.
All casino games aspire to the condition of slot machines.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.
Wow. That reporter certainly makes herself look stupid and/or like a shill for the electronic poker table manufacturer...
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.
whats the deal with just posting news reports all the time pokerpaired? whats your point of view on all these news articles you post?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.
[ QUOTE ]
whats the deal with just posting news reports all the time pokerpaired? whats your point of view on all these news articles you post? [/ QUOTE ] he’s graduated from a sandwich board proclaiming world doom |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.
[ QUOTE ]
That's the underlying problem with these disneyland corporations, they want ALL their customers money. They're not satisfied with a tidy profit, they want ridiculously enourmous profits. [/ QUOTE ] I suppose you prefer the days when Vegas was barely a rest stop on the way to LA? Do you think Steve Wynn & Co. invested $630 million in the Mirage so he could keep dropping $3/hand in rake? Personally, I prefer the grandeur that is today's Vegas, and so do (#_of_2007_Vegas_tourists - #_of_1988_Vegas_tourists) other people. What do you think built these ridiculously luxurious mega-resorts if not ridiculously enormous profits / the anticipation of ridiculously enormous profits? [ QUOTE ] It's not enough they have always made a killing at blackjack. Now they only pay 6/5 on half the games in town. Dealers hit soft 17. Any and all minute edges towards what was still "advantage: house" are being taken away. Soon blackjack will just be a booth where you write a check to parball corporation, LLC. They probably won't even provide a dank alley for you to die in without charging you. [/ QUOTE ] Then don't play. Or go to dingy old downtown where they still spread a decent game. I stopped doing that myself when I started making some decent money and decided I'd rather treat myself to a good time when I went to Vegas, rather than couting cards at the Four Queens even though the odds are better there. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.
On the rare occasion I do play blackjack in this town, it is always downtown at the plaza or four queens. I was born during the day, but not yesterday.
And I don't begrudge businesses making a profit, not at all. I do begrudge businesses who screw both their customers and employees alike, motivated only by profits. These companies have forgotten that you can shear a sheep many times, but skin them only once. There are businesses that both provide a product or service at a fair price, and make a very nice profit at the same time. Sometimes they even treat their employees very well. I do preferentially patronize these places whenever I can. The lucky lady in san diego is just such a place, which is why I played about 95% of my san diego poker there. Stan, kudos to you for running a great room and taking care of your customers. Those days may be numbered, but that doesn't make it right. I'm sure walmart and harrahs would prefer that stan die in a gutter, but they're probably trying to figure out how to get a buck out of his dead carcus. Corporate america is scum, plain and simple. The mega resorts could do much better in the long run by taking care of people now, even if that means slightly less profits today. They won't go broke, nor will their stockholders fail to collect their dividends. But for the most part, it seems they were born at night, last night. Al |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.
I don't understand about these new-fangled poker things. Are they like the poker machines in bar tops? Or, do several people play at them at one time? Does it mean that there are no longer cards and chips to handle? I'm not a great player, but I don't think I'd continue playing in such a soulless environment.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.
[ QUOTE ]
Corporate america is scum, plain and simple. The mega resorts could do much better in the long run by taking care of people now, even if that means slightly less profits today. [/ QUOTE ] If this were the case, then why hasn't the dominant model (as you describe it) been challenged? If capitalism (when allowed to function) has proven anything it's that when there's a more efficient/better way of doing something, it will be discovered and implemented. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Poker is a necessary annoyance for casino executives.
[ QUOTE ]
And I don't begrudge businesses making a profit, not at all. I do begrudge businesses who screw both their customers and employees alike, motivated only by profits. These companies have forgotten that you can shear a sheep many times, but skin them only once. Corporate america is scum, plain and simple. The mega resorts could do much better in the long run by taking care of people now, even if that means slightly less profits today. [/ QUOTE ] Well, that would be very convenient for you, if it were true; they'd make more money by doing what you want them to do. But where are your arguments in support of that bold contention? If you ask me, I think the best strategy is to take all their money as fast as you can (cost of *ahem* goods sold is lower that way) and then tell them you'll give them a free room & other bonuses next time they drop by -- exactly what they're trying to do now, incidentally. But what do I know. Maybe you're dead on about maximizing long term profits and this guy could learn a thing or two about the casino business by reading this thread. |
|
|