Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-2007, 03:40 PM
ceczar ceczar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 295
Default Re: Hypothetical Management Decision re: non-tipping patron of restaur

[ QUOTE ]
Big parties are exponentially more difficult and time-consuming to serve than smaller ones.

[/ QUOTE ]
i don't think this is true. it wouldn't surprise me if the returns to scale aren't significant, but i'd be shocked if it was on average more difficult to serve a table of 12 than 3 tables of 4.

now, your other point is certainly valid and a good reason to institute an autograt. when splitting the bill, people often make huge mistakes when calculating their share of the bill, and these mistakes are almost always biased towards paying less (forgetting to add tax, forgetting about your share of that appetizer you split with a friend, etc).

that said, i really think the autograt should be 15% and not 18%. the few times i've seen a %20 autograt i've stiffed (left 15%, not 0) them out of principle.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-08-2007, 03:46 PM
The Owl The Owl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: lol razzaments
Posts: 103
Default Re: Hypothetical Management Decision re: non-tipping patron of restaur

Nits: You are nits.

Non-Nits: Arguing with nits about tipping is a fool's errand.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2007, 04:07 PM
samsonite2100 samsonite2100 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Bustin\' Makes Me Feel Good
Posts: 1,092
Default Re: Hypothetical Management Decision re: non-tipping patron of restaur

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Big parties are exponentially more difficult and time-consuming to serve than smaller ones.

[/ QUOTE ]
i don't think this is true. it wouldn't surprise me if the returns to scale aren't significant, but i'd be shocked if it was on average more difficult to serve a table of 12 than 3 tables of 4.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is totally true. Big parties, are 10x harder to wait on: harder to get people's attention, harder logistically, harder to make sure the kitchen gets everything right, etc.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-08-2007, 07:08 PM
mosdef mosdef is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,414
Default Re: Hypothetical Management Decision re: non-tipping patron of restaur

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Big parties are exponentially more difficult and time-consuming to serve than smaller ones.

[/ QUOTE ]
i don't think this is true. it wouldn't surprise me if the returns to scale aren't significant, but i'd be shocked if it was on average more difficult to serve a table of 12 than 3 tables of 4.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is totally true. Big parties, are 10x harder to wait on: harder to get people's attention, harder logistically, harder to make sure the kitchen gets everything right, etc.

[/ QUOTE ]

Is it harder to serve one table with 10 people or 5 tables of 2 people?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.