Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Business, Finance, and Investing
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 11-12-2007, 10:33 PM
bills217 bills217 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: taking DVaut\'s money
Posts: 3,294
Default Why are value investor types so rigidly opposed to TA?

I mean, I get that they are philosophically very different (if not opposed), but I really do not understand the immediate dismissal of all things TA by a lot of value investors I have come into contact with recently.

Friday I met with a group of analysts at a value investing firm, and when I told one of them about my interest in TA, he chuckled and said to not even mention it to the other analysts.

That is just one anecdote, but it seems like I have been getting this a lot lately - and I am hardly an opponent of value investing.

Why are those types so ready to dismiss TA as worthless? How could so many people use it so successfully if it is really all smoke and mirrors? And why do valuation and TA have to be mutually exclusive when it comes to making buy/sell decisions? What's wrong with using a combination of the two?

Any insight would be appreciated.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.