Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-08-2007, 11:49 PM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,465
Default Re: Weather Channel Founder says\"Global Warming is Biggest Scam in His

it's a scam because if the purpose wasn't greater taxation and control (which is the real purpose of the scam), then the real logical thing to do would be to pump money into solar power.

the nano solar guys are saying solar will be competitive within 5 years, if they can just be left alone to do their thing. the article below reads like an ad and probably is, but the reality is that the infant nanotech industry is headed there. it's a lot money to retool, and if g.w. were real, the gov could spend a lot of money on nano solar research, and then a lot of money on retooling the economy away from oil and onto solar.

the fact that they just want to tax and regulate and control more, and that's it, as a responsse to manmade global warming is the biggest reason it can't be real.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/money/mai...9/ccview19.xml
[ QUOTE ]
The "tipping point" will arrive when the capital cost of solar power falls below $1 (51p) per watt, roughly the cost of carbon power. We are not there yet. The best options today vary from $3 to $4 per watt - down from $100 in the late 1970s.

Mr Sethi believes his product will cut the cost to 80 cents per watt within five years, and 50 cents in a decade.

It is based on a CIGS (CuInGaSe2) semiconductor compound that absorbs light by freeing electrons. This is then embedded on the polymer base. It will be ready commercially in late 2009.

"It'll even work on a cold, grey, cloudy day in England, which still produces 25pc to 30pc of the optimal light level. That is enough, if you cover half the roof," he said.

"We don't need subsidies, we just need governments to get out of the way and do no harm. They've spent $170bn subsidising nuclear power over the last thirty years," he said.

[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-08-2007, 11:53 PM
Ineedaride2 Ineedaride2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: *
Posts: 1,517
Default Re: Weather Channel Founder says\"Global Warming is Biggest Scam in His

I think the extreme increase in the polar bear population within the last year would corroborate his view.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-08-2007, 11:55 PM
iron81 iron81 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Resident Donk
Posts: 6,806
Default Re: Weather Channel Founder says\"Global Warming is Biggest Scam in His

[ QUOTE ]
it's a scam because if the purpose wasn't greater taxation and control (which is the real purpose of the scam), then the real logical thing to do would be to pump money into solar power.

[/ QUOTE ]
The federal government already has a variety of subsidy programs for renewable energy and more money is a part of most of the presidential candidates platforms.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-09-2007, 12:04 AM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,465
Default Re: Weather Channel Founder says\"Global Warming is Biggest Scam in His

[ QUOTE ]
The federal government already has a variety of subsidy programs for renewable energy and more money is a part of most of the presidential candidates platforms.

[/ QUOTE ]

no I mean like a manhattan project for solar energy, and then a lot of programs to get individuals and businesses and industries to switch over.

I mean, right now renewable energy is just a waste for 99% because it just isn't cost competitive.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-09-2007, 12:54 AM
romdom romdom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 183
Default Re: Weather Channel Founder says\"Global Warming is Biggest Scam in His

pay ur CO2 taxes global citizens!!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-09-2007, 01:14 AM
Borodog Borodog is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Performing miracles.
Posts: 11,182
Default Re: Weather Channel Founder says\"Global Warming is Biggest Scam in His

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The federal government already has a variety of subsidy programs for renewable energy and more money is a part of most of the presidential candidates platforms.

[/ QUOTE ]

no I mean like a manhattan project for solar energy, and then a lot of programs to get individuals and businesses and industries to switch over.


[/ QUOTE ]

Government will fight distributed solar tooth and nail because it would largely decentralize electric power generation and threaten the electric power cartel.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-09-2007, 01:53 AM
Metric Metric is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,178
Default Re: Weather Channel Founder says\"Global Warming is Biggest Scam in His

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The federal government already has a variety of subsidy programs for renewable energy and more money is a part of most of the presidential candidates platforms.

[/ QUOTE ]

no I mean like a manhattan project for solar energy, and then a lot of programs to get individuals and businesses and industries to switch over.


[/ QUOTE ]

Government will fight distributed solar tooth and nail because it would largely decentralize electric power generation and threaten the electric power cartel.

[/ QUOTE ]
A good thing the government is there to keep us from ravaging the environment, isn't it?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-09-2007, 03:56 AM
Mark1808 Mark1808 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 590
Default Re: Weather Channel Founder says\"Global Warming is Biggest Scam in His

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The federal government already has a variety of subsidy programs for renewable energy and more money is a part of most of the presidential candidates platforms.

[/ QUOTE ]

no I mean like a manhattan project for solar energy, and then a lot of programs to get individuals and businesses and industries to switch over.

I mean, right now renewable energy is just a waste for 99% because it just isn't cost competitive.

[/ QUOTE ]

The manhattan project was to spend money to buld a nuclear bomb. Government spending is not going to make a non price comeptitive product price competitive. Did the government subsidize the car industry to replace horses? In fact can you site one example where government made an entire industry price competitive? Sure wasn't the Post Office!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-09-2007, 04:12 AM
AlexM AlexM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Imaginationland
Posts: 5,200
Default Re: Weather Channel Founder says\"Global Warming is Biggest Scam in His

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The federal government already has a variety of subsidy programs for renewable energy and more money is a part of most of the presidential candidates platforms.

[/ QUOTE ]

no I mean like a manhattan project for solar energy, and then a lot of programs to get individuals and businesses and industries to switch over.

I mean, right now renewable energy is just a waste for 99% because it just isn't cost competitive.

[/ QUOTE ]

The manhattan project was to spend money to buld a nuclear bomb. Government spending is not going to make a non price comeptitive product price competitive. Did the government subsidize the car industry to replace horses? In fact can you site one example where government made an entire industry price competitive? Sure wasn't the Post Office!

[/ QUOTE ]

Sure, by banning hemp, they made all kings of things price competitive with hemp products.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-09-2007, 04:24 AM
PLOlover PLOlover is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3,465
Default Re: Weather Channel Founder says\"Global Warming is Biggest Scam in His

[ QUOTE ]
The manhattan project was to spend money to buld a nuclear bomb. Government spending is not going to make a non price comeptitive product price competitive. Did the government subsidize the car industry to replace horses? In fact can you site one example where government made an entire industry price competitive? Sure wasn't the Post Office!

[/ QUOTE ]

the point is that in 1940, atomic bombs were about a decade or two away given advancing technology.

today, given nanotechnoly and it's advancement, solar power that is *cheaper* than fossil fuels is between 10 and 30 years depending on who you ask. I posted a link to one guy in this thread.

see the parallel?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.