debate thread - Page 3

Dima2000123 · #21 10-21-2007, 10:44 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm a registered Dem and I'm considering switching parties to vote for him, or just stick with Obama.

[/ QUOTE ]

Does not compute.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm a registered Democrat, and not only will I vote for Paul in the primaries, but I also donated to his campaign. I think that the candidates from both parties share very dangerous delusions, and the more chances Paul has to make his point, the better off it'll be for the country.

mjkidd · #22 10-21-2007, 10:49 PM

Paul wasn't very effective in this debate. I think he tried to tie too many things into his answers and ended up making no sense.

I thought that Thompson did a nice job tonight. Romney had one of his poorer performances, and Rudy was average. McCain had the best line of the night (I was tied up during Woodstock), even if it was obviously canned. Huckabee was super Christian and creepy.

Barretboy · #23 10-21-2007, 10:50 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm a registered Dem and I'm considering switching parties to vote for him, or just stick with Obama.

[/ QUOTE ]

Does not compute.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm a registered Democrat, and not only will I vote for Paul in the primaries, but I also donated to his campaign. I think that the candidates from both parties share very dangerous delusions, and the more chances Paul has to make his point, the better off it'll be for the country.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was referring to the fact that he is so adamant about voting for Paul, but will settle for Obama. As far as I can tell they are pretty different in their views...

mjkidd · #24 10-21-2007, 10:51 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm a registered Dem and I'm considering switching parties to vote for him, or just stick with Obama.

[/ QUOTE ]

Does not compute.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm a registered Democrat, and not only will I vote for Paul in the primaries, but I also donated to his campaign. I think that the candidates from both parties share very dangerous delusions, and the more chances Paul has to make his point, the better off it'll be for the country.

[/ QUOTE ]

I was referring to the fact that he is so adamant about voting for Paul, but will settle for Obama. As far as I can tell they are pretty different in their views...

[/ QUOTE ]

ALSO RON PAUL IS A RACIST HOW CAN AN OBAMA SUPPORTER VOTE FOR A KNOWN RACIST!!!!!!????!!!!

Dima2000123 · #25 10-21-2007, 10:54 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Paul wasn't very effective in this debate. I think he tried to tie too many things into his answers and ended up making no sense.

[/ QUOTE ]
I agree, I think he was underwhelming in the last two debates, just when he least needed to be. Then again, if those Fox goose-steppers booed him, then they must've got the point well enough. I hope this kind of treatment results in a backlash just like it did after South Carolina debate.

UlidEyes · #26 10-21-2007, 11:16 PM

Tancredo won't get much credit, and I don't support him, but I really liked his answers. He did good. I think everyone can agree that Duncan Hunter needs to step out of the way.

AlexM · #27 10-21-2007, 11:17 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
they sure did a good job marginalizing Ron tonight. Idiots.

[/ QUOTE ]

He does quite well at marginalizing himself, he doesnt need their help

[/ QUOTE ]

Only to silly neocons, not with independents or real old school conservatives.

Case Closed · #28 10-21-2007, 11:17 PM

I am watching the re-run of this and 15 minutes in it seems like they have a Hilary complex.

Case Closed · #29 10-21-2007, 11:19 PM

[ QUOTE ]
As a human being, I'm not overly impressed with the talent pool this year.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yup.

Dima2000123 · #30 10-21-2007, 11:22 PM

If you're going to have a drinking game while watching the debates, then you probably shouldn't drink every time you hear "Hillary", unless you want to miss the last three quarters of it. You probably shouldn't use "the next question is for Ron Paul" either, unless you want to walk away completely sober.