|
|
#13
07-22-2007, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $600 NL, bluffing a river block bet
[ QUOTE ]
thats a pretty high wtsd.. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah it is which makes me dislike the bet a lot more. I shouldn't have included it in the post because I didn't look during the hand (should have obv). 
|
|
#14
07-22-2007, 06:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $600 NL, bluffing a river block bet
[ QUOTE ]
thats a pretty high wtsd.. [/ QUOTE ] pretty meaningless over 70 hands I bet if you didn't include results in OP, people would not have hated it so much. I don't do this much, but I don't think this is such a bad spot for it...
|
|
#15
07-22-2007, 07:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: $600 NL, bluffing a river block bet
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] thats a pretty high wtsd.. [/ QUOTE ] pretty meaningless over 70 hands I bet if you didn't include results in OP, people would not have hated it so much. I don't do this much, but I don't think this is such a bad spot for it... [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, WTSD numbers take a lot longer to develop correctly than do things like VPIP. Mostly because most hands don't go to showdown and if they have a few hands that got checked down, say after limping in the SB this number will be artifically high. I don't why I included results, I guess I wanted to say the bluff failed but was my logic wrong.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
